These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34482242)
1. BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis. Dibble EH; Singer TM; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():315-321. PubMed ID: 34482242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography. Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts. Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening? Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography. Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer. Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound. Huang JL; Lin Q Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade. Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional US or DBT after digital mammography: which one is the best combination? Elizalde A; Pina L; Etxano J; Slon P; Zalazar R; Caballeros M Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25523063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Adding Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to BI-RADS Categorization of Mammographically Equivocal Breast Lesions. Hassan RM; Almalki YE; Basha MAA; Alduraibi SK; Aboualkheir M; Almushayti ZA; Aldhilan AS; Aly SA; Alshamy AA Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37189524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Tice JA; Gard CC; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Joe BN; Ho TH; Kerlikowske K Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 34812671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the Utilization of the BI-RADS Category 3 Assessment in Recalled Patients Before and After the Implementation of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Stepanek T; Constantinou N; Marshall H; Pham R; Thompson C; Dubchuk C; Plecha D Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1515-1525. PubMed ID: 30665715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk. Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis. Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Arrival of Prior Mammograms on Recall Negation for Screening Mammograms Performed With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Clinical Setting. Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 30196816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Added Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Combined with Digital Mammography According to Reader Agreement: Changes in BI-RADS Rate and Follow-Up Management. Galati F; Marzocca F; Bassetti E; Luciani ML; Tan S; Catalano C; Pediconi F Breast Care (Basel); 2017 Sep; 12(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 29070984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]