These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34482942)

  • 1. The effect of corrosive substances on fingermark recovery: A pilot study.
    Masterson A; Bleay S
    Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):617-626. PubMed ID: 34482942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of scanning Kelvin probe with SEM/EPMA techniques for fingermark recovery from metallic surfaces.
    Challinger SE; Baikie ID; Flannigan G; Halls S; Laing K; Daly L; Nic Daeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():44-52. PubMed ID: 30138750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualising the past - An evaluation of processes and sequences for fingermark recovery from old documents.
    Bleay S; Fitzgerald L; Sears V; Kent T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Mar; 59(2):125-137. PubMed ID: 30798859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fingermark visualisation on uncirculated £5 (Bank of England) polymer notes: Initial process comparison studies.
    Downham RP; Brewer ER; King RSP; Luscombe AM; Sears VG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():30-43. PubMed ID: 28292656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding physical developer (PD): Part I--Is PD targeting lipids?
    de la Hunty M; Moret S; Chadwick S; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():481-487. PubMed ID: 26282793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further investigations into the single metal deposition (SMD II) technique for the detection of latent fingermarks.
    Newland TG; Moret S; Bécue A; Lewis SW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Nov; 268():62-72. PubMed ID: 27693827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualisation of latent fingermarks on polymer banknotes using copper vacuum metal deposition: A preliminary study.
    Davis LWL; Kelly PF; King RSP; Bleay SM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():e86-e92. PubMed ID: 27342344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of paint type on the development of latent fingermarks on walls.
    Dawkins J; Gautam L; Bandey H; Armitage R; Ferguson L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Apr; 309():110186. PubMed ID: 32092621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Greasy fingermark detection on porous surfaces using Oil red O in a gas phase: Comparison with Oil red O in solution.
    Klemczak K; Kozdrój-Miler K; Siejca A; Lityński K; Leśniewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111417. PubMed ID: 35963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding Physical Developer (PD): Part II--Is PD targeting eccrine constituents?
    de la Hunty M; Moret S; Chadwick S; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():488-495. PubMed ID: 26482525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks: A pseudo-operational trial.
    Fieldhouse S; Parsons R; Bleay S; Walton-Williams L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110076. PubMed ID: 31862657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the columnar-thin-film and vacuum-metal-deposition techniques to develop sebaceous fingermarks on nonporous substrates.
    Williams SF; Pulsifer DP; Shaler RC; Ramotowski RS; Brazelle S; Lakhtakia A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 25421147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fingermark visualisation on metal surfaces: An initial investigation of the influence of surface condition on process effectiveness.
    Pitera M; Sears VG; Bleay SM; Park S
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):372-383. PubMed ID: 30193663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques.
    Moret S; Lee PLT; de la Hunty M; Spindler X; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():103-112. PubMed ID: 30500490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks.
    Fieldhouse S; Oravcova E; Walton-Williams L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():78-88. PubMed ID: 27572637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection.
    Chadwick S; Moret S; Jayashanka N; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():381-389. PubMed ID: 29960948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clean and clear (out): A neat method for the recovery of latent fingermarks from crime-scenes.
    Harush-Brosh Y; Hefetz I; Hauzer M; Mayuoni-Kirshenbaum L; Mashiach Y; Faerman M; Levin-Elad M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110049. PubMed ID: 31785509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fingermark detection based on the in situ growth of luminescent nanoparticles--towards a new generation of multimetal deposition.
    Becue A; Scoundrianos A; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18502068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latent fingermark visualisation using a scanning Kelvin probe.
    Williams G; McMurray N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):102-9. PubMed ID: 17023134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of strong afterglow phosphor powder in the detection of fingermarks.
    Liu L; Zhang Z; Zhang L; Zhai Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Jan; 183(1-3):45-9. PubMed ID: 19019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.