These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34482991)

  • 1. Anastomotic stricture after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: An evaluation of incidence, risk factors, and treatment.
    Koshy RM; Brown JM; Chmelo J; Watkinson T; Phillips AW
    Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):393-398. PubMed ID: 34482991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
    Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.
    Kukar M; Ben-David K; Peng JS; Attwood K; Thomas RM; Hennon M; Nwogu C; Hochwald SN
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Aug; 24(8):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31317458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function.
    Ramchandani NK; Kesler KA; Rogers JD; Valsangkar N; Stokes SM; Jalal SI
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Apr; (158):. PubMed ID: 32364542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
    Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early prediction of complex benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy using early postoperative endoscopic findings.
    Nishikawa K; Fujita T; Yuda M; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Tanishima Y; Yanaga K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3460-3469. PubMed ID: 31571033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate and Comparison with Esophagectomy-Alone Controls.
    Stuart CM; Mott NM; Dyas AR; Byers S; Gergen AK; Mungo B; Stewart CL; McCarter MD; Randhawa SK; David EA; Mitchell JD; Meguid RA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):4261-4270. PubMed ID: 38413507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy.
    Williams VA; Watson TJ; Zhovtis S; Gellersen O; Raymond D; Jones C; Peters JH
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1470-6. PubMed ID: 18027040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Post-esophagectomy with a Standardized Sutured Anastomosis.
    Ahmed Z; Elliott JA; King S; Donohoe CL; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
    World J Surg; 2017 Feb; 41(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 27778075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy.
    van Heijl M; Gooszen JA; Fockens P; Busch OR; van Lanschot JJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Ann Surg; 2010 Jun; 251(6):1064-9. PubMed ID: 20485137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Johansson J; Oberg S; Wenner J; Zilling T; Johnsson F; von Holstein CS; Walther B
    Ann Surg; 2009 Nov; 250(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 19801933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
    Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.