These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34483710)

  • 1. "Where will I belong more?": The role of belonging comparisons between STEM fields in high school girls' STEM interest.
    Veldman J; Van Laar C; Thoman DB; Van Soom C
    Soc Psychol Educ; 2021; 24(5):1363-1387. PubMed ID: 34483710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
    Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes.
    Cheryan S; Master A; Meltzoff AN
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():49. PubMed ID: 25717308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gendered Paths Into STEM-Related and Language-Related Careers: Girls' and Boys' Motivational Beliefs and Career Plans in Math and Language Arts.
    Lazarides R; Lauermann F
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1243. PubMed ID: 31244713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students' sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
    Rattan A; Savani K; Komarraju M; Morrison MM; Boggs C; Ambady N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 29911882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing the gender gap on adolescents' interest in study fields: The impact of perceived changes in ingroup gender norms and gender prototypicality.
    Iacoviello V; Valsecchi G; Vétois M; Falomir-Pichastor JM
    Soc Psychol Educ; 2024; 27(3):1043-1063. PubMed ID: 39070575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online mentoring for girls in secondary education to increase participation rates of women in STEM: A long-term follow-up study on later university major and career choices.
    Stoeger H; Debatin T; Heilemann M; Schirner S; Ziegler A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2023 May; 1523(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 36987948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
    Cheryan S; Ziegler SA; Montoya AK; Jiang L
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 143(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 27732018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When trying hard isn't natural: women's belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.
    Smith JL; Lewis KL; Hawthorne L; Hodges SD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 23187722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 100-day mentoring program leads to positive shifts in girls' perceptions and attitudes towards biomechanics and related STEM disciplines.
    Dick TJM; Besomi M; Coltman CE; Diamond LE; Hall M; Maharaj J; Kean CO; Barzan M; Mickle KJ
    J Biomech; 2024 Aug; 173():112244. PubMed ID: 39067185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students.
    Deiglmayr A; Stern E; Schubert R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1114. PubMed ID: 31191382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.
    Stoet G; Geary DC
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Apr; 29(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 29442575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adolescent girls' experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and english.
    Leaper C; Farkas T; Brown CS
    J Youth Adolesc; 2012 Mar; 41(3):268-82. PubMed ID: 21769612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gendered Pathways: How Mathematics Ability Beliefs Shape Secondary and Postsecondary Course and Degree Field Choices.
    Perez-Felkner L; Nix S; Thomas K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():386. PubMed ID: 28428762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
    Ahlqvist S; London B; Rosenthal L
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23818652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Girls' comparative advantage in reading can largely explain the gender gap in math-related fields.
    Breda T; Napp C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(31):15435-15440. PubMed ID: 31308226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female and male adolescents' subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors.
    Perez-Felkner L; McDonald SK; Schneider B; Grogan E
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Nov; 48(6):1658-73. PubMed ID: 22390658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM.
    Rainey K; Dancy M; Mickelson R; Stearns E; Moller S
    Int J STEM Educ; 2018; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 30631700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. I am done with this! Women dropping out of engineering majors.
    González-Pérez S; Martínez-Martínez M; Rey-Paredes V; Cifre E
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():918439. PubMed ID: 36033057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breadth-Based Models of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM Fields: An Integrative Commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012).
    Valla JM; Ceci SJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 9(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 25076979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.