These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34484036)

  • 1. Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679256. PubMed ID: 34484036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study on consumers' choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1016933. PubMed ID: 36304864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumers' decoy effect when purchasing pork with traceability technologies.
    Chen M; Liu P; Wu L
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():941936. PubMed ID: 35968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chicken meat taste preferences, perceived risk of human infection with avian influenza virus, and self-reported chicken meat consumption in China.
    Cui B; Wang LD; Chen X; Xu MY; Ke J; Tian Y
    Prev Vet Med; 2022 Jun; 203():105658. PubMed ID: 35500380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
    Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
    Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.
    Giannetto C; Biondi V; Previti A; De Pascale A; Monti S; Alibrandi A; Zirilli A; Lanfranchi M; Pugliese M; Passantino A
    Foods; 2023 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 38231599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not.
    Vanhonacker F; Verbeke W
    Poult Sci; 2009 Dec; 88(12):2702-11. PubMed ID: 19903971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya.
    Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F
    Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat.
    Van Loo E; Caputo V; Nayga RM; Meullenet JF; Crandall PG; Ricke SC
    J Food Sci; 2010 Sep; 75(7):S384-97. PubMed ID: 21535573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of different chicken meat production systems on consumers' purchase perception.
    Pinto da Rosa P; Pio Ávila B; Damé Veber Angelo I; Garavaglia Chesini R; Albandes Fernandes T; da Silva Camacho J; Bugoni M; Roll VFB; Gularte MA
    Br Poult Sci; 2021 Jun; 62(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 33251830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compromise Effect in Food Consumer Choices in China: An Analysis on Pork Products.
    Wu L; Gong X; Chen X; Hu W
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1352. PubMed ID: 32695046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring Consumer Behavior and Preferences in Welfare-Friendly Pork Breeding: A Multivariate Analysis.
    Pugliese M; Previti A; De Pascale A; Alibrandi A; Zirilli A; Biondi V; Passantino A; Monti S; Giannetto C; Lanfranchi M
    Foods; 2023 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 37628013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.
    Katiyo W; Coorey R; Buys EM; de Kock HL
    J Food Sci; 2020 Jun; 85(6):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 32469089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Purchasing Habits, Sustainability Perceptions, and Welfare Concerns of Italian Consumers Regarding Rabbit Meat.
    Crovato S; Pinto A; Di Martino G; Mascarello G; Rizzoli V; Marcolin S; Ravarotto L
    Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35563932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute.
    Chen M; Hu E; Kuen LL; Wu L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():675554. PubMed ID: 34276494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market.
    McCarthy M; O'Reilly S; Cotter L; de Boer M
    Appetite; 2004 Aug; 43(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 15262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.