126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34488227)
1. Case-mix adjustment to compare colonoscopy performance between endoscopy centers: a nationwide registry study.
Nass KJ; van der Vlugt M; Elfrink AKE; van den Brand CL; Wilschut JA; Fockens P; Dekker E; Wouters MWJM;
Endoscopy; 2022 May; 54(5):455-462. PubMed ID: 34488227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry.
Nass KJ; van der Schaar PJ; van der Vlugt M; Ledeboer M; van Esch AAJ; van der Beek S; Lacle MM; van Leerdam ME; Ouwendijk RJT; Spaander MCW; Wouters MWJM; Fockens P; Dekker E
Endoscopy; 2022 May; 54(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 34293811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colonoscopy performance monitoring: do we need to adjust for case mix?
Pedersen L; Bernstein I; Lindorff-Larsen K; Carlsen C; Gerds T; Torp-Pedersen C
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(8):937-944. PubMed ID: 36756743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement.
de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; Ledeboer M; van Leerdam ME; Spaander MCW; van Esch AAJ; Ouwendijk RJ; van der Schaar PJ; van der Beek S; Lacle MM; Seegers PA; Wouters MWJM; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):154-162.e1. PubMed ID: 32057727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication.
Mangas-Sanjuan C; Santana E; Cubiella J; Rodríguez-Camacho E; Seoane A; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Suárez A; Álvarez-García V; González N; Luè A; Cid-Gomez L; Ponce M; Bujanda L; Portillo I; Pellisé M; Díez-Redondo P; Herráiz M; Ono A; Pizarro Á; Zapater P; Jover R;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 May; 18(5):1216-1223.e2. PubMed ID: 31446179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality indicators for colonoscopy in a Tunisian endoscopy unit.
Ennaifer R; Elleuch N; Sabbagh S; Romdhane H; Hefaiedh R; Ben Nejma H; Belhadj N
Tunis Med; 2015 Mar; 93(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 26367400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short Term Outcomes of Using Fecal Immunochemical Test for a Pilot Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. A Single Center Study on 3024 Consecutive Patients.
Constantin A; Cazacu I; Ciocârlan M; Constantinescu C; Baltog G; Balahura C; Doraş I; Filip S; Filip G; Panazan I; Piţigoi D; Pirvu V; Turcu F; Copăescu C; Săftoiu A
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2020; 115(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 32876018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.
Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy at a tertiary hospital in South-West Nigeria: How frequent and what affects completion rate?
Akere A; Akande KO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):303-306. PubMed ID: 28256484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
