273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34488838)
1. PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.
Zhao Z; Yi Y; Song J; Wu Y; Zhong X; Lin Y; Hohman TJ; Fletcher J; Lu Q
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):257. PubMed ID: 34488838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cancer PRSweb: An Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores for Major Cancer Traits and Their Evaluation in Two Independent Biobanks.
Fritsche LG; Patil S; Beesley LJ; VandeHaar P; Salvatore M; Ma Y; Peng RB; Taliun D; Zhou X; Mukherjee B
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):815-836. PubMed ID: 32991828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leveraging both individual-level genetic data and GWAS summary statistics increases polygenic prediction.
Albiñana C; Grove J; McGrath JJ; Agerbo E; Wray NR; Bulik CM; Nordentoft M; Hougaard DM; Werge T; Børglum AD; Mortensen PB; Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jun; 108(6):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 33964208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. POLARIS: Polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data.
Baker E; Schmidt KM; Sims R; O'Donovan MC; Williams J; Holmans P; Escott-Price V; Consortium WTG
Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 42(4):366-377. PubMed ID: 29532500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tuning parameters for polygenic risk score methods using GWAS summary statistics from training data.
Jiang W; Chen L; Girgenti MJ; Zhao H
Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):24. PubMed ID: 38169469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.
Ruan Y; Lin YF; Feng YA; Chen CY; Lam M; Guo Z; ; He L; Sawa A; Martin AR; Qin S; Huang H; Ge T
Nat Genet; 2022 May; 54(5):573-580. PubMed ID: 35513724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leveraging effect size distributions to improve polygenic risk scores derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies.
Song S; Jiang W; Hou L; Zhao H
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 16(2):e1007565. PubMed ID: 32045423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores as a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease.
Vlachakis D; Papakonstantinou E; Sagar R; Bacopoulou F; Exarchos T; Kourouthanassis P; Karyotis V; Vlamos P; Lyketsos C; Avramopoulos D; Mahairaki V
Cells; 2021 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34209762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The omnigenic model and polygenic prediction of complex traits.
Mathieson I
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1558-1563. PubMed ID: 34331855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation and implications for polygenic risk scores in healthcare.
Slunecka JL; van der Zee MD; Beck JJ; Johnson BN; Finnicum CT; Pool R; Hottenga JJ; de Geus EJC; Ehli EA
Hum Genomics; 2021 Jul; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 34284826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying polygenic risk score methods to pharmacogenomics GWAS: challenges and opportunities.
Zhai S; Mehrotra DV; Shen J
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38152980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PRSet: Pathway-based polygenic risk score analyses and software.
Choi SW; García-González J; Ruan Y; Wu HM; Porras C; Johnson J; ; Hoggart CJ; O'Reilly PF
PLoS Genet; 2023 Feb; 19(2):e1010624. PubMed ID: 36749789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The construction of cross-population polygenic risk scores using transfer learning.
Zhao Z; Fritsche LG; Smith JA; Mukherjee B; Lee S
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Nov; 109(11):1998-2008. PubMed ID: 36240765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leveraging existing GWAS summary data of genetically correlated and uncorrelated traits to improve power for a new GWAS.
Xue H; Wu C; Pan W
Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):717-732. PubMed ID: 32677173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalizing polygenic risk scores from Europeans to Hispanics/Latinos.
Grinde KE; Qi Q; Thornton TA; Liu S; Shadyab AH; Chan KHK; Reiner AP; Sofer T
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 43(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 30368908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SUPERGNOVA: local genetic correlation analysis reveals heterogeneous etiologic sharing of complex traits.
Zhang Y; Lu Q; Ye Y; Huang K; Liu W; Wu Y; Zhong X; Li B; Yu Z; Travers BG; Werling DM; Li JJ; Zhao H
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):262. PubMed ID: 34493297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating European GWAS findings improve polygenic risk prediction accuracy of breast cancer among East Asians.
Ji Y; Long J; Kweon SS; Kang D; Kubo M; Park B; Shu XO; Zheng W; Tao R; Li B
Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):471-484. PubMed ID: 33739539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
