These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34489772)

  • 1. Greater Knowledge Enhances Complainant Credibility and Increases Jury Convictions for Child Sexual Assault.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Martschuk N; Lee E; Cossins A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():624331. PubMed ID: 34489772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: the effect of expert evidence and judicial directions.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Cossins A; O'Brien K
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):769-83. PubMed ID: 21110393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
    Miller QC; Call AA; London K
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An archival analysis of actual cases of historic child sexual abuse: A comparison of jury and bench trials.
    Read JD; Connolly DA; Welsh A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):259-85. PubMed ID: 16786401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
    McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
    Ryan N; Westera N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential effects of direct and cross examination on mock jurors' perceptions and memory in cases of child sexual abuse.
    Olaguez AP; Klemfuss JZ
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(5):778-796. PubMed ID: 33859514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Evidence Type and Judicial Warning on Juror Perceptions of Global and Specific Witness Evidence.
    Wheatcroft JM; Keogan H
    J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 151(3):247-267. PubMed ID: 27982750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Gender on Perceptions of Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases: A Systematic Review.
    Voogt A; Klettke B
    J Child Sex Abus; 2017; 26(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 28350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "Casting Couch" Scenario: Impact of Perceived Employment Benefit, Reporting Delay, Complainant Gender, and Participant Gender on Juror Decision-Making in Rape Cases.
    Mcintosh S; Davis JP
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 May; 37(9-10):NP6676-NP6696. PubMed ID: 33084469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived.
    McKimmie BM; Masser BM; Bongiorno R
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Aug; 29(12):2273-2303. PubMed ID: 24470567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.