These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34490643)

  • 1. When I say … Likert item.
    Krupat E
    Med Educ; 2022 Feb; 56(2):149-150. PubMed ID: 34490643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the lack of comonotonicity between likert scores and Rasch-based measures.
    Bertoli-Barsotti L
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15701945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric features of an assessment instrument with likert and dichotomous response formats.
    Capik C; Gozum S
    Public Health Nurs; 2015; 32(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25227501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods.
    Downey RG; King C
    J Gen Psychol; 1998 Apr; 125(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 9935342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire to screen psychological distress from survivorship to end-of-life care: dimensionality and item quality.
    Gao W; Stark D; Bennett MI; Siegert RJ; Murray S; Higginson IJ
    Psychooncology; 2012 Sep; 21(9):954-61. PubMed ID: 21557386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling.
    Garamendi E; Pesudovs K; Stevens MJ; Elliott DB
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1375-83. PubMed ID: 16105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling for rater effects when comparing survey items with incomplete Likert data.
    Schulz EM; Sun A
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):337-55. PubMed ID: 12011503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single- versus multi-item scales in measuring death anxiety.
    Abdel-Khalek AM
    Death Stud; 1998 Dec; 22(8):763-72. PubMed ID: 10346701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-level psychometrics of the ADL instrument of the Korean National Survey on persons with physical disabilities.
    Hong I; Lee MJ; Kim MY; Park HY
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2867-2875. PubMed ID: 28685214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing a German-language Expanded Form of the PhoPhiKat-45: Psychometric Properties, Factorial Structure, Measurement Invariance with the Likert-Version, and Self-Peer Convergence.
    Brauer K; Proyer RT
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 32057257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correcting the Kuder-Richardson reliability for dispersion of item difficulties.
    HORST P
    Psychol Bull; 1953 Sep; 50(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 13100528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: self-efficacy for managing daily activities.
    Hong I; Velozo CA; Li CY; Romero S; Gruber-Baldini AL; Shulman LM
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2221-32. PubMed ID: 27048495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M; Jeon M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2325-2344. PubMed ID: 29322400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and Validity of the 4-Item Version of the Korean Perceived Stress Scale.
    Kim HJ
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Dec; 39(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27546692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychosocial consequences of cancer cachexia: the development of an item bank.
    Häne H; Oberholzer R; Walker J; Hopkinson JB; de Wolf-Linder S; Strasser F
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Dec; 46(6):795-806. PubMed ID: 23602324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two methods of measuring fatigue in patients on chronic haemodialysis: visual analogue vs Likert scale.
    Brunier G; Graydon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1996 Jun; 33(3):338-48. PubMed ID: 8736478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of fatigue: Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure.
    Kim HJ; Abraham I
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Jan; 65():35-43. PubMed ID: 27821285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment.
    Phelps AS; Naeger DM; Courtier JL; Lambert JW; Marcovici PA; Villanueva-Meyer JE; MacKenzie JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 25539230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Development of Chinese Version of Transcultural Nursing Self-Efficiency Scale: Using Rasch Model Analysis.
    Tian Y; Wang L; Xu Y; He Z
    J Transcult Nurs; 2021 Jan; 32(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 31910793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis.
    Ferketich S
    Res Nurs Health; 1991 Apr; 14(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 2047538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.