514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34490668)
1. Maternal and fetal characteristics for predicting risk of Cesarean section following induction of labor: pooled analysis of PROBAAT trials.
Quach D; Ten Eikelder M; Jozwiak M; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KWM; Mol BW; Li W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 34490668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second-trimester cervical length as risk indicator for Cesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy.
van de Mheen L; Schuit E; Liem SM; Lim AC; Bekedam DJ; Goossens SM; Franssen MT; Porath MM; Oudijk MA; Bloemenkamp KW; Duvekot JJ; Woiski MD; de Graaf I; Sikkema JM; Scheepers HC; van Eijk J; de Groot CJ; van Pampus MG; Mol BW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 25402630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for Cesarean delivery in pregnancy with small-for-gestational-age fetus undergoing induction of labor.
Nwabuobi C; Gowda N; Schmitz J; Wood N; Pargas A; Bagiardi L; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Kuznicki M; Sinkey R; Odibo A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 31441151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome.
Frick A; Kostiv V; Vojtassakova D; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 31692170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lower uterine segment thickness assessed by transvaginal ultrasound before labor induction: reproducibility analysis and relationship with delivery outcome.
Del Campo A; Aiartzaguena A; Suárez B; Rodríguez A; Rodríguez L; Burgos J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 35802514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy.
Kamel RA; Negm SM; Youssef A; Bianchini L; Brunelli E; Pilu G; Soliman M; Nicolaides KH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):609.e1-609.e11. PubMed ID: 33412128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.
Obeidat RA; Almaaitah M; Ben-Sadon A; Istaiti D; Rawashdeh H; Hamadneh S; Hammouri H; Bataineh A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Oct; 21(1):685. PubMed ID: 34620120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal cardiovascular function and risk of intrapartum fetal compromise in women undergoing induction of labor: pilot study.
Kalafat E; Barratt I; Nawaz A; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 56(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 31710723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction model for the incidence of emergent cesarean section during induction of labor specialized in nulliparous low-risk women.
Isono W; Nagamatsu T; Uemura Y; Fujii T; Hyodo H; Yamashita T; Kamei Y; Kozuma S; Taketani Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 21793999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction.
Roos N; Sahlin L; Ekman-Ordeberg G; Kieler H; Stephansson O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20636240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of vaginal delivery following balloon catheter for labor induction in women with one previous cesarean.
Ma K; Yang M; Feng X; Liu L; Li L; Li Y
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jun; 23(1):417. PubMed ID: 37277699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
