209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34490809)
1. Evaluation of VMAT Planning Strategies for Prostate Patients with Bilateral Hip Prosthesis.
To D; Xhaferllari I; Liu M; Liang J; Knill C; Nandalur S; Gustafson G; Lack D
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211038490. PubMed ID: 34490809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of mixed energy partial arcs for volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.
Momin S; Gräfe JL; Khan RF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):51-65. PubMed ID: 30861308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT.
Bartlett GK; Njeh CF; Huang KC; DesRosiers C; Guo G
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36319515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of geometrical uncertainties on localized prostate radiotherapy of patients with bilateral metallic hip prostheses using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT: A planning study.
Soda R; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Shimbo M; Yamano T; Nishimura K; Kondo S; Utsumi N; Takahashi T
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):243-254. PubMed ID: 31985486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer.
Pasler M; Georg D; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):792-8. PubMed ID: 22127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric quality, accuracy, and deliverability of modulated radiotherapy treatments for spinal metastases.
Kairn T; Papworth D; Crowe SB; Anderson J; Christie DR
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 27545010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of gantry rotation time on plan quality and dosimetric verification--volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Pasler M; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 22127360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in dosimetric distribution and plan complexity with collimator angles in hypofractionated volumetric arc radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer.
Li MH; Huang SF; Chang CC; Lin JC; Tsai JT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 29322625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying a commercial atlas-based synthetic Computed Tomography algorithm to patients with hip prostheses for prostate Magnetic Resonance-only radiotherapy.
Wyatt J; McCallum H
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Apr; 133():100-105. PubMed ID: 30935564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses.
Parenica HM; Mavroidis P; Jones W; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819892255. PubMed ID: 31789113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer: LINAC-based non-coplanar VMAT vs. Cyberknife planning.
Zhang Y; Chiu T; Dubas J; Tian Z; Lee P; Gu X; Yan Y; Sher D; Timmerman R; Zhao B
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Nov; 14(1):193. PubMed ID: 31684993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of complexity and deliverability of prostate cancer treatment plans designed with a knowledge-based VMAT planning technique.
Wall PDH; Fontenot JD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 31816175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
