These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34490922)

  • 21. Bileaflet mechanical aortic valves do not alter ascending aortic wall shear stress.
    Farag ES; Schade EL; van Ooij P; Boekholdt SM; Planken RN; van Kimmenade R; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM; Kluin J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 30741363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Valve mediated hemodynamics and their association with distal ascending aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve subjects.
    Raghav V; Barker AJ; Mangiameli D; Mirabella L; Markl M; Yoganathan AP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):246-254. PubMed ID: 28390180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of the aortic valve angle on the hemodynamic features of the thoracic aorta.
    Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():32316. PubMed ID: 27561388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Altered aortic shape in bicuspid aortic valve relatives influences blood flow patterns.
    Schnell S; Smith DA; Barker AJ; Entezari P; Honarmand AR; Carr ML; Malaisrie SC; McCarthy PM; Collins J; Carr JC; Markl M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 17(11):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 27461208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of beta-blocker therapy on aortic blood flow in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
    Allen BD; Markl M; Barker AJ; van Ooij P; Carr JC; Malaisrie SC; McCarthy P; Bonow RO; Kansal P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 26817758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Novel Method of Assessing Ascending Aorta with a Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
    Hattori K; Fukuda I; Daitoku K; Fukuda W; Minakawa M; Suzuki Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 26897833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systolic flow displacement correlates with future ascending aortic growth in patients with bicuspid aortic valves undergoing magnetic resonance surveillance.
    Burris NS; Sigovan M; Knauer HA; Tseng EE; Saloner D; Hope MD
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):635-9. PubMed ID: 24784460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.
    Rose MJ; Jarvis K; Chowdhary V; Barker AJ; Allen BD; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK; Schnell S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1673-1682. PubMed ID: 27192153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased rotational flow in the proximal aortic arch is associated with its dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Dux-Santoy L; Guala A; Teixidó-Turà G; Ruiz-Muñoz A; Maldonado G; Villalva N; Galian L; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Sao-Avilés A; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Huguet M; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A; Rodríguez-Palomares JF
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1407-1417. PubMed ID: 30919887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential flow improvements after valve replacements in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment.
    Bissell MM; Loudon M; Hess AT; Stoll V; Orchard E; Neubauer S; Myerson SG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29422054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.
    Viscardi F; Vergara C; Antiga L; Merelli S; Veneziani A; Puppini G; Faggian G; Mazzucco A; Luciani GB
    Artif Organs; 2010 Dec; 34(12):1114-20. PubMed ID: 20618222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in bicuspid aortic valve disease demonstrates altered distribution of aortic blood flow helicity.
    Lorenz R; Bock J; Barker AJ; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Wallis W; Korvink JG; Bissell MM; Schulz-Menger J; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1542-53. PubMed ID: 23716466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
    Oechtering TH; Sieren MM; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 159(3):798-810.e1. PubMed ID: 31078313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves.
    Singh A; Horsfield MA; Bekele S; Greenwood JP; Dawson DK; Berry C; Hogrefe K; Kelly DJ; Houston JG; Guntur Ramkumar P; Uddin A; Suzuki T; McCann GP
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2340-2349. PubMed ID: 30488106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of Aortic Dilation on the Regional Aortic Stiffness of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4-Dimensional Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Comparison With Marfan Syndrome and Degenerative Aortic Aneurysm.
    Guala A; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Dux-Santoy L; Teixido-Tura G; Maldonado G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Sao Avilés A; Garcia-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):1020-1029. PubMed ID: 29778849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. From unicuspid to quadricuspid: influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics.
    Entezari P; Schnell S; Mahadevia R; Malaisrie C; McCarthy P; Mendelson M; Collins J; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 40(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 24265266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aortic valve stenosis and aortic diameters determine the extent of increased wall shear stress in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Farag ES; van Ooij P; Planken RN; Dukker KCP; de Heer F; Bouma BJ; Robbers-Visser D; Groenink M; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM; Kluin J; Boekholdt SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):522-530. PubMed ID: 29451963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3D axial and circumferential wall shear stress from 4D flow MRI data using a finite element method and a laplacian approach.
    Sotelo J; Dux-Santoy L; Guala A; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Evangelista A; Sing-Long C; Urbina J; Mura J; Hurtado DE; Uribe S
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2816-2823. PubMed ID: 28980342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative Analysis of Vortical Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta Using 4D Phase Contrast MRI.
    von Spiczak J; Crelier G; Giese D; Kozerke S; Maintz D; Bunck AC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139025. PubMed ID: 26418327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fully quantitative mapping of abnormal aortic velocity and wall shear stress direction in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and repaired coarctation using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    van Ooij P; Farag ES; Blanken CPS; Nederveen AJ; Groenink M; Planken RN; Boekholdt SM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Feb; 23(1):9. PubMed ID: 33588887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.