190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34490952)
41. Screening for women with increased risk of fragility fractures in a general female population using digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR).
Wilczek ML; Bhatta L; Brumpton BM; Freyschuss B; Brismar TB
Maturitas; 2021 Feb; 144():60-67. PubMed ID: 33358210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women.
Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Correlates With Prevalent Fractures, and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates.
Tripto-Shkolnik L; Vered I; Peltz-Sinvani N; Kowal D; Goldshtein I
Endocr Pract; 2021 May; 27(5):408-412. PubMed ID: 33934751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) predicts fracture risk in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Whitlock RH; Leslie WD; Shaw J; Rigatto C; Thorlacius L; Komenda P; Collister D; Kanis JA; Tangri N
Kidney Int; 2019 Feb; 95(2):447-454. PubMed ID: 30579724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Does diabetes modify the effect of FRAX risk factors for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fracture?
Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM; Majumdar SR
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2817-24. PubMed ID: 25092059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Development of a Korean Fracture Risk Score (KFRS) for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk: Analysis of Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.
Kim HY; Jang EJ; Park B; Kim TY; Shin SA; Ha YC; Jang S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158918. PubMed ID: 27399597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The association between 10-year fracture risk by FRAX and osteoporotic fractures with disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Phuan-Udom R; Lektrakul N; Katchamart W
Clin Rheumatol; 2018 Oct; 37(10):2603-2610. PubMed ID: 30039267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Is tubal ligation a risk factor for low bone density and increased risk of fracture?
Fox KM; Cummings SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):101-5. PubMed ID: 7847513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Gender differences in osteoporotic hip fractures in Sarawak General Hospital.
Wan SA; Tiong IK; Chuah SL; Cheong YR; Singh BSM; Lee KH; Lee WWH; Teh CL; Tiong JK; Samsudin A; Jobli AT
Med J Malaysia; 2023 Mar; 78(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 36988532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Administrative healthcare data applied to fracture risk assessment.
Yang S; Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 30554259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort.
Leslie WD; Pahlavan PS; Tsang JF; Lix LM;
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1767-74. PubMed ID: 19238304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women.
Lippuner K; Johansson H; Kanis JA; Rizzoli R
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Jul; 20(7):1131-40. PubMed ID: 18974918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Development of 5-Year Prediction Models Using the FRISBEE Study.
Baleanu F; Moreau M; Charles A; Iconaru L; Karmali R; Surquin M; Benoit F; Mugisha A; Paesmans M; Rubinstein M; Rozenberg S; Bergmann P; Body JJ
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2022 May; 107(6):e2438-e2448. PubMed ID: 35176768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.
Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.
Ettinger B; Ensrud KE; Blackwell T; Curtis JR; Lapidus JA; Orwoll ES;
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1185-93. PubMed ID: 23179575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validated risk rule using computerized data to identify males at high risk for fracture.
LaFleur J; Nelson RE; Yao Y; Adler RA; Nebeker JR
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):1017-27. PubMed ID: 21562876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Leslie WD; Luo Y; Yang S; Goertzen AL; Ahmed S; Delubac I; Lix LM
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 30852033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Nov; 25(11):2350-8. PubMed ID: 20499367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study.
Leslie WD; Martineau P; Bryanton M; Lix LM
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 31016351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
