These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34491131)

  • 1. Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.
    Zhu X; Wolfgruber TK; Leong L; Jensen M; Scott C; Winham S; Sadowski P; Vachon C; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 34491131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
    Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.
    Akselrod-Ballin A; Chorev M; Shoshan Y; Spiro A; Hazan A; Melamed R; Barkan E; Herzel E; Naor S; Karavani E; Koren G; Goldschmidt Y; Shalev V; Rosen-Zvi M; Guindy M
    Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):331-342. PubMed ID: 31210611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study.
    Yala A; Schuster T; Miles R; Barzilay R; Lehman C
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 31385754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography Breast Cancer Screening Triage Using Deep Learning: A UK Retrospective Study.
    Hickman SE; Payne NR; Black RT; Huang Y; Priest AN; Hudson S; Kasmai B; Juette A; Nanaa M; Aniq MI; Sienko A; Gilbert FJ
    Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e231173. PubMed ID: 37987665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.
    Pedemonte S; Tsue T; Mombourquette B; Truong Vu YN; Matthews T; Morales Hoil R; Shah M; Ghare N; Zingman-Daniels N; Holley S; Appleton CM; Su J; Wahl RL
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230033. PubMed ID: 38597785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
    Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence System for Interval Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Mammography.
    Nanaa M; Gupta VO; Hickman SE; Allajbeu I; Payne NR; Arponen O; Black R; Huang Y; Priest AN; Gilbert FJ
    Radiology; 2024 Aug; 312(2):e232303. PubMed ID: 39189901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
    Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.