BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34491471)

  • 21. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
    Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiation dose to patients from X-ray radiographic examinations using computed radiography imaging system.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Pawar S; Chaubey A; Kantharia S; Babu DA
    J Med Phys; 2015; 40(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26150685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.
    İnal T; Ataç G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
    Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of patients' organ doses and conceptus doses from selected X-ray examinations in two Nigeria X-ray centres.
    Ogundare FO; Olarinoye IO; Obed RI
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19129203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Entrance surface dose of the common radiological investigations in Abuth, Zaria.
    Nwokorie E; Akpa TC; Mallam OP; Akpan E; Ibinaye PO; Obiako OR; Nzotta C; Ugwu AC
    East Afr J Public Health; 2011 Sep; 8(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 23120957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
    Hart G; Dugdale M
    Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography.
    Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient's effective dose and performance assessment of computed radiography systems.
    Bushra A; Sulieman A; Edam A; Tamam N; Babikir E; Alrihaima N; Alfaki E; Babikir S; Almujally A; Otayni A; Alkhorayef M; Abdelradi A; Bradley DA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Mar; 193():110627. PubMed ID: 36584412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
    Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ESTABLISHMENT OF RADIATION DOSES FOR PEDIATRIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN A LARGE PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL IN TURKEY.
    Olgar T; Sahmaran T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Nov; 176(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 28338894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic image quality of mobile neonatal chest X-rays and the radiation exposure incurred.
    Lowe A; Finch A; Boniface D; Chaudhuri R; Shekhdar J
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):55-61. PubMed ID: 10341690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit.
    Armpilia CI; Fife IA; Croasdale PL
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jul; 75(895):590-5. PubMed ID: 12145132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
    Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
    Saeed MK
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.