These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34492090)

  • 1. Safety and image quality at 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation systems: Ex vivo study with lead-only and full-systems.
    Bhusal B; Stockmann J; Guerin B; Mareyam A; Kirsch J; Wald LL; Nolt MJ; Rosenow J; Lopez-Rosado R; Elahi B; Golestanirad L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257077. PubMed ID: 34492090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
    Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak PP; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Lopez-Rosado R; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 32860322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3-Tesla MRI of deep brain stimulation patients: safety assessment of coils and pulse sequences.
    Boutet A; Hancu I; Saha U; Crawley A; Xu DS; Ranjan M; Hlasny E; Chen R; Foltz W; Sammartino F; Coblentz A; Kucharczyk W; Lozano AM
    J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 132(2):586-594. PubMed ID: 30797197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3-Tesla MRI in patients with fully implanted deep brain stimulation devices: a preliminary study in 10 patients.
    Sammartino F; Krishna V; Sankar T; Fisico J; Kalia SK; Hodaie M; Kucharczyk W; Mikulis DJ; Crawley A; Lozano AM
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 127(4):892-898. PubMed ID: 28009238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation.
    Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow JM; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
    J Neurosurg; 2024 May; 140(5):1459-1470. PubMed ID: 37948679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems.
    Vu J; Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak P; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Golestanirad L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278187. PubMed ID: 36490249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems.
    Kazemivalipour E; Bhusal B; Vu J; Lin S; Nguyen BT; Kirsch J; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1560-1572. PubMed ID: 33961301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations.
    Kazemivalipour E; Vu J; Lin S; Bhusal B; Thanh Nguyen B; Kirsch J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():6143-6146. PubMed ID: 33019373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open-bore vertical MRI systems: A simulation study with realistic device configurations.
    Golestanirad L; Kazemivalipour E; Lampman D; Habara H; Atalar E; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Kirsch J
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jun; 83(6):2284-2292. PubMed ID: 31677308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T.
    Kazemivalipour E; Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Keil B; Eryaman Y; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280655. PubMed ID: 36701285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging patients pre and post deep brain stimulation: Localization of the electrodes and their targets.
    Li Y; Buch S; He N; Zhang C; Zhang Y; Wang T; Li D; Haacke EM; Yan F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 75():34-44. PubMed ID: 32961237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical Note: An anthropomorphic phantom with implanted neurostimulator for investigation of MRI safety.
    Yang B; Tam F; Davidson B; Wei PS; Hamani C; Lipsman N; Chen CH; Graham SJ
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3745-3751. PubMed ID: 32350868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple geometric analysis method for measuring and mitigating RF induced currents on Deep Brain Stimulation leads by multichannel transmission/reception.
    Eryaman Y; Kobayashi N; Moen S; Aman J; Grant A; Vaughan JT; Molnar G; Park MC; Vitek J; Adriany G; Ugurbil K; Harel N
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():658-668. PubMed ID: 30273715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T.
    Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5192-5197. PubMed ID: 33019155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management.
    Golestanirad L; Kirsch J; Bonmassar G; Downs S; Elahi B; Martin A; Iacono MI; Angelone LM; Keil B; Wald LL; Pilitsis J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():566-576. PubMed ID: 30243973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients.
    Boutet A; Rashid T; Hancu I; Elias GJB; Gramer RM; Germann J; Dimarzio M; Li B; Paramanandam V; Prasad S; Ranjan M; Coblentz A; Gwun D; Chow CT; Maciel R; Soh D; Fiveland E; Hodaie M; Kalia SK; Fasano A; Kucharczyk W; Pilitsis J; Lozano AM
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 31385756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.
    Kahan J; Papadaki A; White M; Mancini L; Yousry T; Zrinzo L; Limousin P; Hariz M; Foltynie T; Thornton J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129077. PubMed ID: 26061738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A workflow for predicting radiofrequency-induced heating around bilateral deep brain stimulation electrodes in MRI.
    Zulkarnain NIH; Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Thotland J; Harel N; Eryaman Y
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1007-1018. PubMed ID: 38153187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient's body composition can significantly affect RF power deposition in the tissue around DBS implants: ramifications for lead management strategies and MRI field-shaping techniques.
    Bhusal B; Keil B; Rosenow J; Kazemivalipour E; Golestanirad L
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(1):015008. PubMed ID: 33238247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A workflow for predicting temperature increase at the electrical contacts of deep brain stimulation electrodes undergoing MRI.
    Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Zulkarnain NIH; He X; Atalar E; Harel N; Eryaman Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Nov; 88(5):2311-2325. PubMed ID: 35781696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.