These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34492211)
1. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review. Kornecki A Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening. Covington MF Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound. Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification. Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brief communication: The current status of contrast-enhanced mammography in breast imaging. Savaria D; Kaushik C Clin Imaging; 2024 Sep; 113():110213. PubMed ID: 38852214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions. Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography. James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions. Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast. Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiomammography: A review of current evidences. Dromain C; Vietti-Violi N; Meuwly JY Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):593-605. PubMed ID: 30962168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis. Gao F; Wu T; Li J; Zheng B; Ruan L; Shang D; Patel B Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():53-62. PubMed ID: 30292910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]