288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34492211)
1. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review.
Kornecki A
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Covington MF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.
Covington MF; Salmon S; Weaver BD; Fajardo LL
Br J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 97(1156):695-704. PubMed ID: 38374651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review.
Patel BK; Lobbes MBI; Lewin J
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 29317041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomammography: A review of current evidences.
Dromain C; Vietti-Violi N; Meuwly JY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):593-605. PubMed ID: 30962168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis.
Gao F; Wu T; Li J; Zheng B; Ruan L; Shang D; Patel B
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():53-62. PubMed ID: 30292910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.
Coffey K; Jochelson MS
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
