These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34492292)

  • 1. Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM; Matusz PJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118556. PubMed ID: 34492292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of attentional control mechanisms in multisensory environments.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Maillard AM; Scerif G; Matusz PJ
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 48():100930. PubMed ID: 33561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.
    Sarmiento BR; Matusz PJ; Sanabria D; Murray MM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):273-88. PubMed ID: 26466522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and prediction modulations in expected and unexpected visuospatial trajectories.
    Baker KS; Pegna AJ; Yamamoto N; Johnston P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0242753. PubMed ID: 34624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
    Seiss E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19410504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals.
    Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 21539576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.