183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34492503)
1. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence.
Jo D; Bilodeau M
Gait Posture; 2021 Oct; 90():167-178. PubMed ID: 34492503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) Scales for Session RPE.
Arney BE; Glover R; Fusco A; Cortis C; de Koning JJ; van Erp T; Jaime S; Mikat RP; Porcari JP; Foster C
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul; 14(7):994-996. PubMed ID: 30569764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale.
Zamunér AR; Moreno MA; Camargo TM; Graetz JP; Rebelo AC; Tamburús NY; da Silva E
J Sports Sci Med; 2011; 10(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24149305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A rating of perceived exertion scale using facial expressions for conveying exercise intensity for children and young adults.
Chen YL; Chiou WK; Tzeng YT; Lu CY; Chen SC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):66-69. PubMed ID: 27267301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exercise Prescription Using a Group-Normalized Rating of Perceived Exertion in Adolescents and Adults With Spina Bifida.
Crytzer TM; Keramati M; Anthony SJ; Cheng YT; Robertson RJ; Dicianno BE
PM R; 2018 Jul; 10(7):738-747. PubMed ID: 29408563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commonly Used Subjective Effort Scales May Not Predict Directly Measured Physical Workloads and Fatigue in Hispanic Farmworkers.
Thamsuwan O; Galvin K; Palmandez P; Johnson PW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls.
Pfeiffer KA; Pivarnik JM; Womack CJ; Reeves MJ; Malina RM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 12471316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of rating of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults and cardiac patients.
Whaley MH; Brubaker PH; Kaminsky LA; Miller CR
J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1997; 17(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 9271770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two Borg exertion scales for monitoring exercise intensity in able-bodied participants, and those with paraplegia and tetraplegia.
Hutchinson MJ; Kouwijzer I; de Groot S; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
Spinal Cord; 2021 Nov; 59(11):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 34040150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of rating of perceived exertion-based tests of physical working capacity.
Mielke M; Housh TJ; Malek MH; Beck TW; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):293-302. PubMed ID: 18296989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the color scale of perceived exertion: preliminary validation.
Serafim TH; Tognato AC; Nakamura PM; Queiroga MR; Nakamura FY; Pereira G; Kokubun E
Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):884-900. PubMed ID: 25387039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Face Pain Scale and Borg Scale compared to physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Morishita S; Tsubaki A; Hotta K; Inoue T; Qin W; Kojima S; Fu JB; Onishi H
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2021 Nov; 61(11):1464-1468. PubMed ID: 33269889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.
Kasai D; Parfitt G; Tarca B; Eston R; Tsiros MD
Sports Med; 2021 Jan; 51(1):33-50. PubMed ID: 33206334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests.
Borg E; Kaijser L
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Feb; 16(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 16430682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of rating of perceived exertion ranges in individuals in the subacute stage of stroke recovery.
Sage M; Middleton LE; Tang A; Sibley KM; Brooks D; McIlroy W
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2013; 20(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 24273299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Cleland BT; Ingraham BA; Pitluck MC; Woo D; Ng AV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 97(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 26836954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of rating perceived exertion in women with fibromyalgia: exertion-pain discrimination.
Soriano-Maldonado A; Ruiz JR; Álvarez-Gallardo IC; Segura-Jiménez V; Santalla A; Munguía-Izquierdo D
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(14):1515-22. PubMed ID: 25537003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.
Chen MJ; Fan X; Moe ST
J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise.
Utter AC; Robertson RJ; Green JM; Suminski RR; McAnulty SR; Nieman DC
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Oct; 36(10):1776-80. PubMed ID: 15595300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A high-intensity, intermittent exercise protocol and dynamic postural control in men and women.
Whyte E; Burke A; White E; Moran K
J Athl Train; 2015 Apr; 50(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 25689420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
