550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34494449)
21. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the impact of telehealth implementation on postpartum outcomes for Black birthing people.
Kumar NR; Arias MP; Leitner K; Wang E; Clement EG; Hamm RF
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100831. PubMed ID: 36496115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surveillance mammography use after treatment of primary breast cancer and racial disparities in survival.
Nurgalieva ZZ; Franzini L; Morgan R; Vernon SW; Liu CC; Du XL
Med Oncol; 2013 Dec; 30(4):691. PubMed ID: 23975632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Population-level impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures.
Nyante SJ; Benefield TS; Kuzmiak CM; Earnhardt K; Pritchard M; Henderson LM
Cancer; 2021 Jun; 127(12):2111-2121. PubMed ID: 33635541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Racial disparities in the screening mammography continuum within a heterogeneous health care system.
Ganguly AP; Baker KK; Redman MW; McClintock AH; Yung RL
Cancer; 2023 Sep; 129(S19):3171-3181. PubMed ID: 37691529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts.
Ezratty C; Vang S; Brown J; Margolies LR; Jandorf L; Lin JJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 32394349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast Cancer Screening and BI-RADS Scoring Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Academic Safety-Net Hospital.
Kobzeva-Herzog A; O'Shea T; Young S; Kenzik K; Zhao X; Slanetz P; Phillips J; Merrill A; Cassidy MR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):2253-2260. PubMed ID: 38177460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following an Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.
Abashidze N; Stecher C; Rosenkrantz AB; Duszak R; Hughes DR
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132388. PubMed ID: 34748010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study.
Yala A; Schuster T; Miles R; Barzilay R; Lehman C
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 31385754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Barriers to breast cancer screening are worsened amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A review.
Tsapatsaris A; Babagbemi K; Reichman MB
Clin Imaging; 2022 Feb; 82():224-227. PubMed ID: 34896935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening in a large midwestern United States academic medical center.
Johnson KJ; O'Connell CP; Waken RJ; Barnes JM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303280. PubMed ID: 38768115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Project ScanVan: Mobile mammography services to decrease socioeconomic barriers and racial disparities among medically underserved women in NYC.
Tsapatsaris A; Reichman M
Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():60-63. PubMed ID: 33770557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Impact of Radiologist Screening Mammogram Reading Volume on Performance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program.
Walker MJ; Hartman K; Majpruz V; Leung YW; Fienberg S; Rabeneck L; Chiarelli AM
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 May; 73(2):362-370. PubMed ID: 34423685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethnic disparities in adherence to breast cancer survivorship surveillance care.
Advani PS; Ying J; Theriault R; Melhem-Bertrand A; Moulder S; Bedrosian I; Tereffe W; Black S; Pini TM; Brewster AM
Cancer; 2014 Mar; 120(6):894-900. PubMed ID: 24258799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.
Lee CS; Goldman L; Grimm LJ; Liu IX; Simanowith M; Rosenberg R; Zuley M; Moy L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 203(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 37897646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
