These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34498231)

  • 1. An in vitro assessment of light intensity provided during direct laryngeal visualization by videolaryngoscopes with Macintosh geometry blades.
    Harlow M; Kovacs G; Brousseau P; Law JA
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 Dec; 68(12):1779-1788. PubMed ID: 34498231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The videoscopic view may not be significantly superior to the directly sighted peroral view during Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopy: a randomized equivalence cadaver trial.
    Malpas G; Kovacs G; Mackinnon SP; Hung O; Phipps S; Law JA
    Can J Anaesth; 2020 Jul; 67(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 32291634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope for Intubation in the Operating Room: A Comparative Quality Improvement Project.
    De Jong A; Pouzeratte Y; Laplace A; Normanno M; Rollé A; Verzilli D; Perrigault PF; Colson P; Capdevila X; Molinari N; Jaber S
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Feb; 132(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32739955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Glidescope® Go™, King Vision™, Dahlhausen VL, I‑View™ and Macintosh laryngoscope use during difficult airway management simulation by experienced and inexperienced emergency medical staff: A randomized crossover manikin study.
    Moritz A; Leonhardt V; Prottengeier J; Birkholz T; Schmidt J; Irouschek A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236474. PubMed ID: 32730283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An audit of laryngoscopes and application of a new ISO standard.
    Baker PA; McQuoid S; Thompson JM; Jacobs RJ
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2011 Apr; 21(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 21299682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
    Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
    Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of first-pass intubation success rates between two different videolaryngoscopes in an Australian prehospital and retrieval medicine service.
    Lacquiere D; Mazur S; Wilkes A; Pearce A
    Emerg Med Australas; 2023 Dec; 35(6):941-945. PubMed ID: 37357023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indirect videolaryngoscopy using Macintosh blades in patients with non-anticipated difficult airways results in significantly lower forces exerted on teeth relative to classic direct laryngoscopy: a randomized crossover trial.
    Pieters B; Maassen R; Van Eig E; Maathuis B; Van Den Dobbelsteen J; Van Zundert A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Aug; 81(8):846-54. PubMed ID: 25311949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
    Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
    Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.
    McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG
    Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC(®) laryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Wallace CD; Foulds LT; McLeod GA; Younger RA; McGuire BE
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1281-5. PubMed ID: 26336853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laryngoscope illuminance in a tertiary children's hospital: implications for quality laryngoscopy.
    Volsky PG; Murphy MK; Darrow DH
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):603-7. PubMed ID: 24831916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Light intensity of curved laryngoscope blades in Philadelphia emergency departments.
    Levitan RM; Kelly JJ; Kinkle WC; Fasano C
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 50(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 17588707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.
    Huang P; Zhou R; Lu Z; Hang Y; Wang S; Huang Z
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32434470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
    Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of direct versus indirect laryngoscopic visualization during endotracheal intubation of lightly embalmed cadavers utilizing the GlideScope®, Storz Medi Pack Mobile Imaging System™ and the New Storz CMAC™ videolaryngoscope.
    Boedeker BH; Nicholas TA; Carpenter J; Leighton S; Bernhagen MA; Murray WB; Wadman MC
    J Spec Oper Med; 2011; 11(2):21-29. PubMed ID: 21706458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.