These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34498985)

  • 1. Impaired selection of a previously ignored singleton: Evidence for salience map plastic changes.
    Turatto M; Valsecchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 34498985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1190-8. PubMed ID: 16502841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across-trial spatial suppression in visual search.
    Wang L; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2744-2752. PubMed ID: 34173208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):443-457. PubMed ID: 35324244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 May; 206():103064. PubMed ID: 32416329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional suppression in time and space.
    Xu Z; Los SA; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 34516212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning.
    Hanne AA; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1672. PubMed ID: 36717593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.