These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34499531)
1. Editorial Comment: Barriers and Enabling Factors That Affect Supplemental Screening. Niell BL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1080. PubMed ID: 34499531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography. Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supplemental screening in the dense breast: does molecular breast imaging have a role? Rhodes DJ Menopause; 2020 Jan; 27(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 31880677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barriers to screening mammography. Sarma EA Health Psychol Rev; 2015; 9(1):42-62. PubMed ID: 25793490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of non attendance to mammography program in a region with high voluntary health insurance coverage. Esteva M; Ripoll J; Leiva A; Sánchez-Contador C; Collado F BMC Public Health; 2008 Nov; 8():387. PubMed ID: 19014522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks]. Nekolla EA; Griebel J; Brix G Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 15717183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of State Dense Breast Notification Laws With Supplemental Testing and Cancer Detection After Screening Mammography. Busch SH; Hoag JR; Aminawung JA; Xu X; Richman IB; Soulos PR; Kyanko KA; Gross CP Am J Public Health; 2019 May; 109(5):762-767. PubMed ID: 30896987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? Berg WA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 19155400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening among women in Thailand: analyses of population-based household surveys. Mukem S; Sriplung H; McNeil E; Tangcharoensathien V J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Nov; 97(11):1106-18. PubMed ID: 25675674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. Glass AG; Lacey JV; Carreon JD; Hoover RN J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 17652280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare program; Medicare coverage of screening mammography--HCFA. Interim final rule with comment. Fed Regist; 1990 Dec; 55(251):53510-25. PubMed ID: 10108588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Glasgow RE; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Vogt TM Ann Behav Med; 2000; 22(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11126467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comment on the contributions regarding quality assurance in mammography]. Mathias K; Neitzel U Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):446-7; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 9646356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician-related barriers to breast cancer screening in older women. Weinberger M; Saunders AF; Bearon LB; Gold DT; Brown JT; Samsa GP; Loehrer PJ J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():111-7. PubMed ID: 1430872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ACOG Committee Opinion. Follow-up of abnormal screening mammography, number 272, May 2002. Committe on Gynecologic Practice Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 99(5 Pt 1):869. PubMed ID: 11978303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]