These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34500262)

  • 1. Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem.
    John S
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():1-9. PubMed ID: 34500262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem.
    Reutlinger A
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Apr; 92():152-161. PubMed ID: 35182965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    J Gen Philos Sci; 2023; 54(2):259-286. PubMed ID: 36843654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust in the time of corona: epistemic practice beyond hard evidence.
    Leung JSC; Cheng MMW
    Cult Stud Sci Educ; 2021; 16(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 33936321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension.
    Barimah GK
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 May; 30(3):21. PubMed ID: 38789842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality of scientific advice to politics. Lecture at the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Science and Humanities].
    Kurth R; Glasmacher S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Apr; 51(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 18357421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The politics and bio-ethics of regulatory trust: case-studies of pharmaceuticals.
    Abraham J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2008 Dec; 11(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 18649014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.
    Böschen S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jul; 16(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 19452181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.
    Rest KM; Halpern MH
    Am J Public Health; 2007 Nov; 97(11):1939-44. PubMed ID: 17901422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's politics, stupid! A political analysis of the HIV/AIDS Trust Fund in Uganda.
    Birungi C; Colbourn T
    Afr J AIDS Res; 2019 Dec; 18(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 31779573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demarcating scientific medicine.
    Fuller J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Aug; 106():177-185. PubMed ID: 38996617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On value-laden science.
    Ward ZB
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Feb; 85():54-62. PubMed ID: 33966783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epistemic austerity: limits to entitlement.
    Ohlhorst J
    Synthese; 2021; 199(5-6):13771-13787. PubMed ID: 35058664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SAGE advice and political decision-making: 'Following the science' in times of epistemic uncertainty.
    Evans R
    Soc Stud Sci; 2022 Feb; 52(1):53-78. PubMed ID: 34963397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The governance of human genetics: policy discourse and constructions of public trust.
    Jones M; Salter B
    New Genet Soc; 2003 Apr; 22(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 15282897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty.
    Leefmann J
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():599909. PubMed ID: 34027299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139309. PubMed ID: 26474078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.
    Enria L; Waterlow N; Rogers NT; Brindle H; Lal S; Eggo RM; Lees S; Roberts CH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0239247. PubMed ID: 33591985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistemic Blame and the Normativity of Evidence.
    Schmidt S
    Erkenntnis; 2021 Jun; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 34149123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science, truth and dictatorship: Wishful thinking or wishful speaking?
    John S
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Dec; 78():64-72. PubMed ID: 31818420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.