These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Epistemic communities and experts in health policy-making. Löblová O Eur J Public Health; 2018 Nov; 28(suppl_3):7-10. PubMed ID: 30383255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Controlling new knowledge: Genomic science, governance and the politics of bioinformatics. Salter B; Salter C Soc Stud Sci; 2017 Apr; 47(2):263-287. PubMed ID: 28056721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bias as an epistemic notion. Bueter A Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():307-315. PubMed ID: 34955230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Martin A; Orr R; Peyton K; Faulkner N PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0225818. PubMed ID: 32092084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reflections on trust and COVID-19: do politics, medicine and the environment need each other? Cole A; Dutheil F; Baker JS UCL Open Environ; 2020; 2():e010. PubMed ID: 37229293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog? Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):992-1008. PubMed ID: 27150266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [On the notion of trust in psychotherapy - epistemic and evaluative aspects]. von Boetticher D Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2021; 67(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 33565377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research. Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):270-288. PubMed ID: 32036741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A role for epistemic trust in speech-language pathology: A tutorial paper. Clarke A; Meredith PJ; Rose TA; Daubney M J Commun Disord; 2018; 72():54-63. PubMed ID: 29471178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics. Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Civilization and its discontented: Links between youth victimization, beliefs about government, and political participation across seven American presidencies. Oosterhoff B; Kaplow JB; Layne CM; Pynoos RS Am Psychol; 2018 Apr; 73(3):230-242. PubMed ID: 29355354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Migrations of Trust: Reasonable Trust and Epistemic Transgressions. Franeta D Hum Stud; 2022; 45(4):719-738. PubMed ID: 36438624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Understanding the psychological nature and mechanisms of political trust. Hamm JA; Smidt C; Mayer RC PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215835. PubMed ID: 31091243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The new demarcation problem. Holman B; Wilholt T Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():211-220. PubMed ID: 34968804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits. Zhang B; Mildenberger M PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Sources of Burelli C; Destri C Ethical Theory Moral Pract; 2022; 25(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 35002478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation: Comparing Institutional Affordances and Constraints of Different Types of Research Funding. Franssen T; Scholten W; Hessels LK; de Rijcke S Minerva; 2018; 56(1):11-33. PubMed ID: 29449745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]