These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34501143)

  • 1. Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation.
    Chirca O; Biclesanu C; Florescu A; Stoia DI; Pangica AM; Burcea A; Vasilescu M; Antoniac IV
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Sep; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 34501143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations.
    Collares K; Corrêa MB; Laske M; Kramer E; Reiss B; Moraes RR; Huysmans MC; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 May; 32(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 26975695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for zirconia ceramic: glaze layer vs zirconia primer.
    Cura C; Özcan M; Isik G; Saracoglu A
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Feb; 14(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 21594233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; D'Amario M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; Caputi S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 19544823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional Resin Cement and Self-adhesive Resin Cement bonded to Lithium Disilicate: An in vitro Study.
    Roy AK; Mohan D; Sunith M; Mandokar RB; Suprasidh S; Rajan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):881-886. PubMed ID: 28989124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay-Onlay Restorations In Vivo.
    Aygün Emiroğlu Ş; Evren B; Kulak Özkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 26215702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
    Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement.
    Kameyama A; Bonroy K; Elsen C; Lührs AK; Suyama Y; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 26407114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method.
    Yassini E; Mirzaei M; Alimi A; Rahaeifard M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():62-69. PubMed ID: 26849028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.