458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34503996)
1. Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.
Desai M; Holder J; Villarreal C; Clark N; Hoang B; Hamilton LS
J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(43):8946-8962. PubMed ID: 34503996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dataset size considerations for robust acoustic and phonetic speech encoding models in EEG.
Desai M; Field AM; Hamilton LS
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():1001171. PubMed ID: 36741776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinct roles of delta- and theta-band neural tracking for sharpening and predictive coding of multi-level speech features during spoken language processing.
Mai G; Wang WS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6149-6172. PubMed ID: 37818940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
Etard O; Reichenbach T
J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congruent Visual Speech Enhances Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Auditory Speech in Noise-Free Conditions.
Crosse MJ; Butler JS; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(42):14195-204. PubMed ID: 26490860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.
Broderick MP; Anderson AJ; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7564-7575. PubMed ID: 31371424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.
Teoh ES; Ahmed F; Lalor EC
J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(4):682-691. PubMed ID: 34893546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural responses to naturalistic audiovisual speech are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users.
Xiu B; Paul BT; Chen JM; Le TN; Lin VY; Dimitrijevic A
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():1043499. PubMed ID: 36419642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosodic pitch processing is represented in delta-band EEG and is dissociable from the cortical tracking of other acoustic and phonetic features.
Teoh ES; Cappelloni MS; Lalor EC
Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 50(11):3831-3842. PubMed ID: 31287601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech.
Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Francart T
J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066017. PubMed ID: 31426053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical processing of distracting speech in noisy auditory scenes depends on perceptual demand.
Hausfeld L; Shiell M; Formisano E; Riecke L
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117670. PubMed ID: 33359352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical linear encoding and decoding of sounds: Similarities and differences between naturalistic speech and music listening.
Simon A; Bech S; Loquet G; Østergaard J
Eur J Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 59(8):2059-2074. PubMed ID: 38303522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Stimulus Choice on an EEG-Based Objective Measure of Speech Intelligibility.
Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 33136634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The level of audiovisual print-speech integration deficits in dyslexia.
Kronschnabel J; Brem S; Maurer U; Brandeis D
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():245-61. PubMed ID: 25084224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
