256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34504121)
21. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of contact force sensing on the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation: discrepancy between observational studies and randomized control trial data.
Virk SA; Ariyaratnam J; Bennett RG; Kumar S
Europace; 2019 Feb; 21(2):239-249. PubMed ID: 30544134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Efficacy and Safety of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of 15 International Randomized Trials.
Huang C; Wang J; He C; Yang K; Zhao H; Chen J; Su L
Cardiol Rev; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 37071112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety and Efficacy of Different Catheter Ablations for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu XH; Chen CF; Gao XF; Xu YZ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Aug; 39(8):883-99. PubMed ID: 27197002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lin H; Chen YH; Hou JW; Lu ZY; Xiang Y; Li YG
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):994-1005. PubMed ID: 28569422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation.
Jourda F; Providencia R; Marijon E; Bouzeman A; Hireche H; Khoueiry Z; Cardin C; Combes N; Combes S; Boveda S; Albenque JP
Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25186456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish catheter ablation registry.
Mörtsell D; Arbelo E; Dagres N; Brugada J; Laroche C; Trines SA; Malmborg H; Höglund N; Tavazzi L; Pokushalov E; Stabile G; Blomström-Lundqvist C;
Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):581-589. PubMed ID: 30376055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis.
Patel N; Patel K; Shenoy A; Baker WL; Makaryus AN; El-Sherif N
Curr Cardiol Rev; 2019; 15(3):230-238. PubMed ID: 30539701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis.
Ma H; Sun D; Luan H; Feng W; Zhou Y; Wu J; He C; Sun C
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej; 2017; 13(3):240-249. PubMed ID: 29056997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation with the use of intracardiac echocardiography versus without intracardiac echocardiography: A meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies.
Xu J; Gao Y; Liu C; Wang Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 May; 33(5):897-907. PubMed ID: 35212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Second-Generation Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Persistent Left Superior Caval Vein.
Santoro F; Rillig A; Sohns C; Pott A; Brunetti ND; Reissmann B; Lemeš C; Maurer T; Fink T; Hashiguchi N; Sano M; Mathew S; Dahme T; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Tilz RR; Metzner A; Heeger CH
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 5(5):590-598. PubMed ID: 31122381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety; the AF-COR study.
Malmborg H; Lönnerholm S; Blomström P; Blomström-Lundqvist C
Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 23703361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endothelial damage and thromboembolic risk after pulmonary vein isolation using the latest ablation technologies: a comparison of the second-generation cryoballoon vs. contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation.
Hisazaki K; Hasegawa K; Kaseno K; Miyazaki S; Amaya N; Shiomi Y; Tama N; Ikeda H; Fukuoka Y; Morishita T; Ishida K; Uzui H; Tada H
Heart Vessels; 2019 Mar; 34(3):509-516. PubMed ID: 30182157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Liu XH; Gao XF; Jin CL; Chen CF; Chen B; Xu YZ
Kardiol Pol; 2020 Jan; 78(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 31688837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon versus conventional radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Mugnai G; Chierchia GB; de Asmundis C; Sieira-Moret J; Conte G; Capulzini L; Wauters K; Rodriguez-Mañero M; Di Giovanni G; Baltogiannis G; Ciconte G; Saitoh Y; Juliá J; Brugada P
Am J Cardiol; 2014 May; 113(9):1509-13. PubMed ID: 24630388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser balloon and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation-a meta-analysis.
Wei Y; Zhang N; Jin Q; Pan W; Xie Y; Chen K; Ling T; Lin C; Bao Y; Luo Q; Xing C; Wu L
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Apr; 54(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 30343439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: new generation cryoballoon or contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation?].
Nagy Z; Kis Z; Som Z; Földesi C; Kardos A
Orv Hetil; 2016 May; 157(22):849-54. PubMed ID: 27211354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incidence and characteristics of phrenic nerve palsy following pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation as compared with the first-generation cryoballoon in 360 consecutive patients.
Fürnkranz A; Bordignon S; Schmidt B; Perrotta L; Dugo D; De Lazzari M; Schulte-Hahn B; Nowak B; Chun JK
Europace; 2015 Apr; 17(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 25564551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
McClure GR; Belley-Cote EP; Jaffer IH; Dvirnik N; An KR; Fortin G; Spence J; Healey J; Singal RK; Whitlock RP
Europace; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1442-1450. PubMed ID: 29186407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Second Generation Cryoballoon vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Outcomes Beyond One-Year Follow-up.
Brito V G; N V; L T; Jj J; I M; L B; S O; S R; G A; A G; F S
J Atr Fibrillation; 2019 Apr; 11(6):2147. PubMed ID: 31384365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence and clinical impact of spontaneous and adenosine-induced pulmonary vein reconduction in the Contact-Force vs. Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study.
Andrade JG; Deyell MW; Nattel S; Khairy P; Dubuc M; Champagne J; Leong-Sit P; Jolly U; Badra-Verdu M; Sapp J; Verma A; Macle L;
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Jun; 17(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 31978593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
