163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34504163)
1. Acoustic tweezing of microparticles in microchannels with sinusoidal cross sections.
Jannesar EA; Hamzehpour H
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17902. PubMed ID: 34504163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-induced acoustophoretic motion of microparticles in three dimensions.
Muller PB; Rossi M; Marín AG; Barnkob R; Augustsson P; Laurell T; Kähler CJ; Bruus H
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Aug; 88(2):023006. PubMed ID: 24032923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of microchannel protrusion on the bulk acoustic wave-induced acoustofluidics: numerical investigation.
Zhou Y
Biomed Microdevices; 2021 Dec; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 34964071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residue-free acoustofluidic manipulation of microparticles via removal of microchannel anechoic corner.
Khan MS; Sahin MA; Destgeer G; Park J
Ultrason Sonochem; 2022 Sep; 89():106161. PubMed ID: 36088893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis.
Antfolk M; Muller PB; Augustsson P; Bruus H; Laurell T
Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2791-9. PubMed ID: 24895052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influences of microparticle radius and microchannel height on SSAW-based acoustophoretic aggregation.
Dong J; Liang D; Yang X; Sun C
Ultrasonics; 2021 Dec; 117():106547. PubMed ID: 34419898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexural wave-based soft attractor walls for trapping microparticles and cells.
Aghakhani A; Cetin H; Erkoc P; Tombak GI; Sitti M
Lab Chip; 2021 Feb; 21(3):582-596. PubMed ID: 33355319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces.
Muller PB; Barnkob R; Jensen MJ; Bruus H
Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4617-27. PubMed ID: 23010952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves.
Nama N; Barnkob R; Mao Z; Kähler CJ; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2700-9. PubMed ID: 26001199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential-well model in acoustic tweezers.
Kang ST; Yeh CK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1451-9. PubMed ID: 20529720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing particle focusing: a comparative experimental study of modified square wave and square wave microchannels in lift and Dean vortex regimes.
Ashkani A; Jafari A; Ghomsheh MJ; Dumas N; Funfschilling D
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):2679. PubMed ID: 38302543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spiral microchannel with rectangular and trapezoidal cross-sections for size based particle separation.
Guan G; Wu L; Bhagat AA; Li Z; Chen PC; Chao S; Ong CJ; Han J
Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1475. PubMed ID: 23502529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Numerical and experimental analysis of a hybrid material acoustophoretic device for manipulation of microparticles.
Barani A; Mosaddegh P; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Sepehrirahnama S; Sanati-Nezhad A
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22048. PubMed ID: 34764352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of the acoustic radiation force of ultrasonic standing waves in half-wavelength and quarter-wavelength micro-resonators of cylindrical geometry.
Yang IH; Kim N
Ultrasonics; 2024 Mar; 138():107267. PubMed ID: 38367402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface Acoustic Wave-Based Microfluidic Device for Microparticles Manipulation: Effects of Microchannel Elasticity on the Device Performance.
Mezzanzanica G; Français O; Mariani S
Micromachines (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 37763962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves.
Collins DJ; Ma Z; Han J; Ai Y
Lab Chip; 2016 Dec; 17(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 27883136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-dimensional spatial manipulation of microparticles in continuous flows in acoustofluidic systems.
Gao L; Wyatt Shields C; Johnson LM; Graves SW; Yellen BB; López GP
Biomicrofluidics; 2015 Jan; 9(1):014105. PubMed ID: 25713687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic manipulation of particles in a cylindrical cavity: Theoretical and experimental study on the effects of boundary conditions.
Xu D; Cai F; Chen M; Li F; Wang C; Meng L; Xu D; Wang W; Wu J; Zheng H
Ultrasonics; 2019 Mar; 93():18-25. PubMed ID: 30384006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From rectangular to diamond shape: on the three-dimensional and size-dependent transformation of patterns formed by single particles trapped in microfluidic acoustic tweezers.
Deng Z; Kondalkar VV; Cierpka C; Schmidt H; König J
Lab Chip; 2023 May; 23(9):2154-2160. PubMed ID: 37013801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Pumpless Acoustofluidic Platform for Size-Selective Concentration and Separation of Microparticles.
Ahmed H; Destgeer G; Park J; Jung JH; Ahmad R; Park K; Sung HJ
Anal Chem; 2017 Dec; 89(24):13575-13581. PubMed ID: 29156880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
