BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34505864)

  • 21. [The evaluation of binocular visual field and clinical application of glaucoma].
    Wu YL; Zhong H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 52(11):872-875. PubMed ID: 27852405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of novel binocular colour, motion and contrast tests in glaucoma.
    Rauscher FG; Chisholm CM; Edgar DF; Barbur JL
    Cell Tissue Res; 2013 Aug; 353(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 23812834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binocular interactions in patients with age-related macular degeneration: acuity summation and rivalry.
    Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2487-98. PubMed ID: 16545856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma.
    Crabb DP; Viswanathan AC; McNaught AI; Poinoosawmy D; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 82(11):1236-41. PubMed ID: 9924324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers.
    McKnight AJ; Shinar D; Hilburn B
    Accid Anal Prev; 1991 Aug; 23(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 1883464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of interocular differences in the Strehl ratio on binocular summation.
    Castro JJ; Jiménez JR; Hita E; Ortiz C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):370-4. PubMed ID: 19422571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
    Nelson-Quigg JM; Cello K; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2212-21. PubMed ID: 10892865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distribution and Progression of Visual Field Defects With Binocular Vision in Glaucoma.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Iwase A; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):519-524. PubMed ID: 29557827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating the Binocular Visual Field of Glaucoma Patients With an Adjustment for Ocular Dominance.
    Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Yanagisawa M; Hirasawa H; Murata H; Sawamura H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3276-81. PubMed ID: 27327583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binocular visual acuity interaction in children: summation and inhibition.
    Lee YB; Choi DG
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):214-218. PubMed ID: 28457294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effect of stimulus size on binocular summation within the binocular visual field].
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Iwagaki A; Matsumoto F; Ohmure K; Shimomura Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Feb; 105(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 11235199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image-based and eye-based influences on binocular rivalry have similar spatial profiles.
    Stuit S; Brascamp J; Barendregt M; van der Smagt M; Pas ST
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):14. PubMed ID: 29071351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers.
    Good GW; Fogt N; Daum KM; Mitchell GL
    Optometry; 2005 May; 76(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 15884418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients.
    Boxer Wachler BS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 12648637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association of Fast Visual Field Loss With Risk of Falling in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Baig S; Diniz-Filho A; Wu Z; Abe RY; Gracitelli CP; Cabezas E; Medeiros FA
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 134(8):880-6. PubMed ID: 27280703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simultaneous mapping of binocular and monocular receptive fields in awake monkeys for calibrating eye alignment in a dichoptical setup.
    Gail A; Brinksmeyer HJ; Eckhorn R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Jun; 126(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 12788501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association Between Undetected 10-2 Visual Field Damage and Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Blumberg DM; De Moraes CG; Prager AJ; Yu Q; Al-Aswad L; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JM; Hood DC
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 135(7):742-747. PubMed ID: 28542692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.