These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34505954)

  • 61. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials.
    Muramatsu T; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ; Chevalier B; Patel TM; Seth A; Diletti R; García-García HM; Dorange CC; Veldhof S; Cheong WF; Ozaki Y; Whitbourn R; Bartorelli A; Stone GW; Abizaid A; Serruys PW; ; ; ; ; ;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 24746650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent　- A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.
    Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Hamazaki Y; Okamura T; Ando J; Ikari Y; Nakagawa Y; Kusano H; Ediebah D; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2020 Apr; 84(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 32213737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: pooled results from the SPIRIT (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice) Trials.
    Planer D; Smits PC; Kereiakes DJ; Kedhi E; Fahy M; Xu K; Serruys PW; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 4(10):1104-15. PubMed ID: 22017936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent.
    Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes.
    Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Ormiston JA; de Bruyne B; Regar E; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hebert K; Rapoza R; García-García HM
    Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(22):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The RESERVOIR Clinical Trial.
    Romaguera R; Gómez-Hospital JA; Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Pinar E; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Gracida M; Roura G; Ferreiro JL; Teruel L; Montanya E; Fernandez-Ortiz A; Alfonso F; Valgimigli M; Sabate M; Cequier A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 9(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 26762910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Randomised comparison of a biodegradable polymer ultra-thin sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the meriT-V trial.
    Abizaid A; Kedev S; Kedhi E; Talwar S; Erglis A; Hlinomaz O; Masotti M; Fath-Ordoubadi F; Lemos PA; Milewski K; Botelho R; Costa R; Bangalore S
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Dec; 14(11):e1207-e1214. PubMed ID: 30222120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial.
    Suwannasom P; Sotomi Y; Ishibashi Y; Cavalcante R; Albuquerque FN; Macaya C; Ormiston JA; Hill J; Lang IM; Egred M; Fajadet J; Lesiak M; Tijssen JG; Wykrzykowska JJ; de Winter RJ; Chevalier B; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(12):1231-1242. PubMed ID: 27262861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Study design and rationale of the EXECUTIVE trial.
    Ribichini F; Ansalone G; Bartorelli A; Beqaraj F; Berni A; Colangelo S; D'Amico M; Della Rovere F; Fiscella A; Gabrielli G; Indolfi C; La Vecchia L; Loschiavo P; Marinoni G; Marzocchi A; Milazzo D; Romano M; Sangiorgio P; Sheiban I; Tamburino C; Tuccillo B; Villani R; Cappi B; Quijada MJ; Vassanelli C;
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Apr; 11(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 20090550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Long-Term Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Versus Acute Coronary Syndromes (TARGET All Comers Trial).
    Patel KP; Lansky AJ; Kelbæk H; Xu B; van Royen N; Johnson TW; Anderson R; Wijns W; Baumbach A;
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 217():94-101. PubMed ID: 38350507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Case series of coronary artery aneurysms after Everolimus eluting stent implantation and comparison with Sirolimus eluting stents.
    Sharma R; Ruia AV; Mahant TS
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):60. PubMed ID: 35172738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent compared with permanent polymer everolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation for treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease: CENTURY II trial.
    Wöhrle J; Markovic S; Rottbauer W; Muramatsu T; Kadota K; Vázquez-González N; Odenstedt J; Serra A; Antoniucci D; Varenne O; Saito S; Wijns W
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e167-74. PubMed ID: 27290676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mid-term safety and efficacy of magnesium bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - magmaris in diabetic population. 2-Years outcome in acute coronary syndrome cohort.
    Włodarczak A; Rola P; Barycki M; Furtan Ł; Łanocha M; Włodarczak S; Szudrowicz M; Kulczycki JJ; Jaroszewska-Pozorska J; Kędzierska M; Giniewicz K; Doroszko A; Lesiak M
    Diab Vasc Dis Res; 2023; 20(4):14791641231188705. PubMed ID: 37439002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. First-in-man study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a second generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary lesions: clinical, Angiographic, and OCT outcomes of CREDIT-1.
    Wang G; Sun Z; Jin Q; Xu K; Li Y; Wang X; Ma Y; Liu H; Zhao X; Wang B; Deng J; Guan S; Ge M; Wang X; Xu B; Han Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85 Suppl 1():744-51. PubMed ID: 25630447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.
    Onuma Y; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Webster M; Nieman K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24156961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
    Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.