BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34505998)

  • 1. Dutch sensory modality norms.
    Speed LJ; Brybaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1306-1318. PubMed ID: 34505998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English.
    Lee J; Shin JA
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1188909. PubMed ID: 37538997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks.
    Vergallito A; Petilli MA; Marelli M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1599-1616. PubMed ID: 31950360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Flickr frequency norms: What 17 years of images tagged online tell us about lexical processing.
    Petilli MA; Günther F; Marelli M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):126-147. PubMed ID: 36509941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.
    Lynott D; Connell L; Brysbaert M; Brand J; Carney J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1271-1291. PubMed ID: 31832879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The English Lexicon Mirrors Functional Brain Activation for a Sensory Hierarchy Dominated by Vision and Audition: Point-Counterpoint.
    Reilly J; Flurie M; Peelle JE
    J Neurolinguistics; 2020 Aug; 55():. PubMed ID: 32226224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.
    Repetto C; Rodella C; Conca F; Santi GC; Catricalà E
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4035-4047. PubMed ID: 36307624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.
    Miceli A; Wauthia E; Lefebvre L; Ris L; Simoes Loureiro I
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():667271. PubMed ID: 34177725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    Cognition; 2012 Dec; 125(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 22935248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2204-2218. PubMed ID: 28155185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form.
    Lynott D; Connell L
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):516-26. PubMed ID: 23055172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.
    Connell L; Lynott D; Banks B
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 373(1752):. PubMed ID: 29915011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ratings of valence, arousal, happiness, anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and surprise for 24,000 Dutch words.
    Speed LJ; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37783901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
    Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dutch taboo norms.
    Roest SA; Visser TA; Zeelenberg R
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):630-641. PubMed ID: 28409486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms.
    Chen IH; Zhao Q; Long Y; Lu Q; Huang CR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211336. PubMed ID: 30785906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexicosemantic, affective, and distributional norms for 1,000 Dutch adjectives.
    Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Linsen S; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1108-1121. PubMed ID: 31654371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables.
    Chedid G; Brambati SM; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Wilson MA; Vallet GT
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2094-2105. PubMed ID: 31016685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence-final completion norms for 2925 Mexican Spanish sentence contexts.
    Angulo-Chavira AQ; Castellón-Flores AM; Ciria A; Arias-Trejo N
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2486-2498. PubMed ID: 37407787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.