174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34505999)
21. Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): the cultural adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish.
Riegel M; Wierzba M; Wypych M; Żurawski Ł; Jednoróg K; Grabowska A; Marchewka A
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1222-1236. PubMed ID: 25588892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What is an Emotion-label Word? Emotional Prototypicality (EmoPro) Rating for 1,083 Chinese Emotion Words and Its Relationships with Psycholinguistic Variables.
Wu C
J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Dec; 52(6):2229-2237. PubMed ID: 37493916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words.
Xu X; Li J; Chen H
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 34100200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Psycholinguistic and affective norms for 1,252 Spanish idiomatic expressions.
Gavilán JM; Haro J; Hinojosa JA; Fraga I; Ferré P
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254484. PubMed ID: 34270572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.
Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories.
Kapucu A; Kılıç A; Özkılıç Y; Sarıbaz B
Psychol Rep; 2021 Feb; 124(1):188-209. PubMed ID: 30514162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: evidence from Italian and German languages.
Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Roivainen E
Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):848-854. PubMed ID: 29873624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words.
Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Imbault C; Pérez Sánchez MA; Brysbaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 26850056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The QWERTY effect: how typing shapes the meanings of words.
Jasmin K; Casasanto D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 22391999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Affective norms for 210 British English and Finnish nouns.
Eilola TM; Havelka J
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 20160293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spanish affective normative data for 1,406 words rated by children and adolescents (SANDchild).
Sabater L; Guasch M; Ferré P; Fraga I; Hinojosa JA
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 32096105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Madrid Affective Database for Spanish (MADS): Ratings of Dominance, Familiarity, Subjective Age of Acquisition and Sensory Experience.
Hinojosa JA; Rincón-Pérez I; Romero-Ferreiro MV; Martínez-García N; Villalba-García C; Montoro PR; Pozo MA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155866. PubMed ID: 27227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Affective norms for 1,586 Polish words (ANPW): Duality-of-mind approach.
Imbir KK
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):860-70. PubMed ID: 25294041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Leipzig Affective Norms for German: a reliability study.
Kanske P; Kotz SA
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):987-91. PubMed ID: 21139165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms.
Hollis G; Westbury C
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):115-133. PubMed ID: 29322399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Affective biases in English are bi-dimensional.
Warriner AB; Kuperman V
Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(7):1147-67. PubMed ID: 25313685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The psycholinguistic and affective structure of words conveying pain.
Borelli E; Crepaldi D; Porro CA; Cacciari C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199658. PubMed ID: 29958269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.
Repetto C; Rodella C; Conca F; Santi GC; Catricalà E
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4035-4047. PubMed ID: 36307624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks.
Vergallito A; Petilli MA; Marelli M
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1599-1616. PubMed ID: 31950360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
