These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34506336)

  • 1. Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature.
    Pushkar DY; Kasyan GR; Popov AA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):531-536. PubMed ID: 34506336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].
    Wagner L; Meurette G; Vidart A; Warembourg S; Terassa JB; Berrogain N; Ragni E; Le Normand L
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S27-37. PubMed ID: 27595624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications: a case series.
    Goodwin AI; Torres J; O'Shaughnessy DL; Finamore PS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3231-3236. PubMed ID: 35267061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hudson CO; Northington GM; Lyles RH; Karp DR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 25181374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.
    Bolovis D; Hitzl W; Brucker C
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 34498174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative adverse events and re-treatment among patients who have undergone laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in Japan.
    Shigemi D; Okada A; Yasunaga H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):114-119. PubMed ID: 36200666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.
    Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
    Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy.
    Lee W; Tam J; Kobashi K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30466696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips.
    Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Paulides TJC; Verheijen PM; Broeders IAMJ; Consten ECJ; Lenters E; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1423-1433. PubMed ID: 31222568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.