These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34506336)

  • 21. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of obesity on operative complications and outcome after sacrocolpopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wen Q; Zhao Z; Wen J; Yang Y; Wang L; Wu J; Miao Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():309-316. PubMed ID: 33498005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Advanced Cystocele is a Risk Factor for Surgical Failure after Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Padoa A; Shiber Y; Fligelman T; Tomashev R; Tsviban A; Smorgick N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):409-415. PubMed ID: 34763064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
    Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients.
    Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS
    Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A case of silicone mesh extrusion into the bladder associated with robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Mukati M; Shobeiri SA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 23797526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.