These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34507507)

  • 1. Redesigning the exploration of semantic dynamics: SSD account in light of regression design.
    Mišić K; Filipović Đurđević D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 34507507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.
    Klepousniotou E
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 12081393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
    Jager B; Cleland AA
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.
    Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
    Li J; Joanisse MF
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
    Syssau A; Laxén J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
    Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy.
    Klepousniotou E; Pike GB; Steinhauer K; Gracco V
    Brain Lang; 2012 Oct; 123(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22819308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
    Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.
    Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
    Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10646204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors.
    Li J; Armstrong BC
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13416. PubMed ID: 38482721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.