These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34507509)

  • 21. See before you jump: full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading.
    Gordon PC; Plummer P; Choi W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):633-41. PubMed ID: 22686842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de () in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Angele B; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 27998212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skipping of Chinese characters does not rely on word-based processing.
    Lin N; Angele B; Hua H; Shen W; Zhou J; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):600-607. PubMed ID: 29127576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context.
    Shen W; Li X; Pollatsek A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 27967331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Oct; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 27734767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading.
    Sereno SC; Hand CJ; Shahid A; Yao B; O'Donnell PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):302-313. PubMed ID: 28481189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mask-related costs in measuring preview benefit: Evidence from a distributional analysis based on target word reading times.
    Fackler NG; Gordon PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2475-2487. PubMed ID: 37532883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Processing difficulty while reading words with neighbors is not due to increased foveal load: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Slattery TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1360-1374. PubMed ID: 38532237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic preview benefit and cost: Evidence from parafoveal fast-priming paradigm.
    Pan J; Yan M; Laubrock J
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104452. PubMed ID: 32971508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parafoveal and foveal N400 effects in natural reading: A timeline of semantic processing from fixation-related potentials.
    Li N; Wang S; Kornrumpf F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2024 May; 61(5):e14524. PubMed ID: 38297818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 32749198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
    Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 24170376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.