These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34507511)

  • 1. Rethinking attentional reset: Task sets determine the boundaries of adaptive control.
    Grant LD; Cerpa SR; Weissman DH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1171-1185. PubMed ID: 34507511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Cookson SL; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):798-812. PubMed ID: 32324028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The binary structure of event files generalizes to abstract features: A nonhierarchical explanation of task set boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 35951436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Sprengel M; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 30083838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The congruency sequence effect in a modified prime-probe task indexes response-general control.
    Weissman DH; Grant LD; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1387-1396. PubMed ID: 32881553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?
    Gottschalk C; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):378-391. PubMed ID: 26850627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.
    Strobach T; Wendt M; Tomat M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103036. PubMed ID: 32086004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual load is not always a crucial determinant of early versus late selection.
    Weissman DH; Drake B; Colella K; Samuel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():125-135. PubMed ID: 29454940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
    Vatterott DB; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):485-499. PubMed ID: 29230673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
    Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.