These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34507511)

  • 21. Determining the scope of control underlying the congruency sequence effect: roles of stimulus-response mapping and response mode.
    Lim CE; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():267-276. PubMed ID: 30170247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cross-modal distractors modulate oscillatory alpha power: the neural basis of impaired task performance.
    Weise A; Hartmann T; Schröger E; Weisz N; Ruhnau P
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 27468982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional capture in driving displays.
    Arexis M; Maquestiaux F; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Didierjean A
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 28369841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinct effects of trial-driven and task Set-related control in primary visual cortex.
    Griffis JC; Elkhetali AS; Vaden RJ; Visscher KM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():285-297. PubMed ID: 26163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-related deficits in the congruency sequence effect are task-specific: An investigation of nine tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):744-764. PubMed ID: 32744855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Jacobsen T
    Cogn Process; 2023 Feb; 24(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 36538134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Let your fingers do the walking: Finger force distinguishes competing accounts of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 31228124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):576-9. PubMed ID: 22390296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Higher interference susceptibility in reaction time task is accompanied by weakened functional dissociation between salience and default mode network.
    Götting FN; Borchardt V; Demenescu LR; Teckentrup V; Dinica K; Lord AR; Rohe T; Hausdörfer DI; Li M; Metzger CD; Walter M
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 May; 649():34-40. PubMed ID: 28347858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluative pressure overcomes perceptual load effects.
    Normand A; Autin F; Croizet JC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):737-42. PubMed ID: 25233881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Task representation affects the boundaries of behavioral slowing following an error.
    Smith DM; Dykstra T; Hazeltine E; Schumacher EH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2315-2326. PubMed ID: 32077071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search.
    Hodsoll J; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18515299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Willmes K; Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 26813694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task structure boundaries affect response preparation.
    Cookson SL; Hazeltine E; Schumacher EH
    Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1610-1621. PubMed ID: 30937613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modulating the influence of recent trial history on attentional capture via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of right TPJ.
    Lega C; Santandrea E; Ferrante O; Serpe R; Dolci C; Baldini E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():149-160. PubMed ID: 33126008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.