These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34507996)

  • 1. The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.
    Porter E; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(37):. PubMed ID: 34507996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks.
    Ecker UKH; O'Reilly Z; Reid JS; Chang EP
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Feb; 111(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 30825195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.
    Chou WS; Gaysynsky A; Vanderpool RC
    Health Educ Behav; 2021 Feb; 48(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 33322939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unlocking Conspiracy Belief Systems: How Fact-Checking Label on Twitter Counters Conspiratorial MMR Vaccine Misinformation.
    Lee J; Kim JW; Yun Lee H
    Health Commun; 2023 Oct; 38(9):1780-1792. PubMed ID: 35086403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines.
    Zhang J; Featherstone JD; Calabrese C; Wojcieszak M
    Prev Med; 2021 Apr; 145():106408. PubMed ID: 33388335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No one is immune to misinformation: An investigation of misinformation sharing by subscribers to a fact-checking newsletter.
    Saling LL; Mallal D; Scholer F; Skelton R; Spina D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255702. PubMed ID: 34375356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomy of an online misinformation network.
    Shao C; Hui PM; Wang L; Jiang X; Flammini A; Menczer F; Ciampaglia GL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196087. PubMed ID: 29702657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter.
    Burel G; Farrell T; Alani H
    Inf Process Manag; 2021 Nov; 58(6):102732. PubMed ID: 34511703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation.
    Collier JR; Pillai RM; Fazio LK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jun; 8(1):37. PubMed ID: 37278735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ephemeral effects of fact-checks on COVID-19 misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada.
    Carey JM; Guess AM; Loewen PJ; Merkley E; Nyhan B; Phillips JB; Reifler J
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 6(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 35115678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Do Citizens Share COVID-19 Fact-Checks Posted by Chinese Government Social Media Accounts? The Elaboration Likelihood Model.
    Chen Q; Zhang Y; Evans R; Min C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crowds Can Effectively Identify Misinformation at Scale.
    Martel C; Allen J; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 19(2):477-488. PubMed ID: 37594056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associations Between COVID-19 Misinformation Exposure and Belief With COVID-19 Knowledge and Preventive Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Online Study.
    Lee JJ; Kang KA; Wang MP; Zhao SZ; Wong JYH; O'Connor S; Yang SC; Shin S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e22205. PubMed ID: 33048825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COVID-19 Misinformation Spread in Eight Countries: Exponential Growth Modeling Study.
    Nsoesie EO; Cesare N; Müller M; Ozonoff A
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e24425. PubMed ID: 33264102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the Impact of Attempts to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis.
    Walter N; Brooks JJ; Saucier CJ; Suresh S
    Health Commun; 2021 Nov; 36(13):1776-1784. PubMed ID: 32762260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism.
    Hoes E; Aitken B; Zhang J; Gackowski T; Wojcieszak M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38858544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misinformation Dissemination in Twitter in the COVID-19 Era.
    Krittanawong C; Narasimhan B; Virk HUH; Narasimhan H; Hahn J; Wang Z; Tang WHW
    Am J Med; 2020 Dec; 133(12):1367-1369. PubMed ID: 32805227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Thought I'd Share First" and Other Conspiracy Theory Tweets from the COVID-19 Infodemic: Exploratory Study.
    Gerts D; Shelley CD; Parikh N; Pitts T; Watson Ross C; Fairchild G; Vaquera Chavez NY; Daughton AR
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Apr; 7(4):e26527. PubMed ID: 33764882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combatting rumors around the French election: the memorability and effectiveness of fact-checking articles.
    Fazio LK; Hong MK; Pillai RM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):44. PubMed ID: 37442850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.