These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34508180)

  • 1. Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer with PSA 10-20 ng/mL: pathological outcome analysis of a population-level database.
    Lonergan PE; Jeong CW; Washington SL; Herlemann A; Gomez SL; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):690-693. PubMed ID: 34508180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
    Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of pretreatment PSA on risk stratification in men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer: Implications for active surveillance.
    Monfared S; Fleishman A; Korets R; Chang P; Wagner A; Bubley G; Kaplan I; Olumi AF; Gershman B
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):783.e21-783.e30. PubMed ID: 33992521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
    Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
    BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gleason Grade 1 Prostate Cancer Volume at Biopsy Is Associated With Upgrading but Not Adverse Pathology or Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Large Institutional Cohort.
    Shee K; Washington SL; Cowan JE; de la Calle CM; Baskin AS; Chappidi MR; Escobar D; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 36067374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
    Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
    Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
    Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.
    Park JW; Koh DH; Jang WS; Cho KS; Ham WS; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Choi YD
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):545. PubMed ID: 29743042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
    Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
    Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk profiles and treatment patterns among men diagnosed as having prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen level below 4.0 ng/ml.
    Shao YH; Albertsen PC; Roberts CB; Lin Y; Mehta AR; Stein MN; DiPaola RS; Lu-Yao GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Jul; 170(14):1256-61. PubMed ID: 20660846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Cote K; Loffredo M; Schultz D; Chen MH; Tomaszewski JE; Renshaw AA; Wein A; Richie JP
    Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 12124827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.