245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34508733)
1. Accuracy of combined molecular and morphology-based triage for HPV-positive women in routine cervical cancer screening services from Colombia.
Murillo R; Gamboa O; Hernández G; González M; Olejua P; Molano M; Wiesner C
Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 153():106801. PubMed ID: 34508733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triaging HPV-positive, cytology-negative cervical cancer screening results with extended HPV genotyping and p16
Song F; Yan P; Huang X; Wang C; Qu X; Du H; Wu R
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 21(1):400. PubMed ID: 33931022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of standardised colposcopy to detect cervical precancer and cancer for triage of women testing positive for human papillomavirus: results from the ESTAMPA multicentric screening study.
Valls J; Baena A; Venegas G; Celis M; González M; Sosa C; Santin JL; Ortega M; Soilán A; Turcios E; Figueroa J; Rodríguez de la Peña M; Figueredo A; Beracochea AV; Pérez N; Martínez-Better J; Lora O; Jiménez JY; Giménez D; Fleider L; Salgado Y; Martínez S; Bellido-Fuentes Y; Flores B; Tatti S; Villagra V; Cruz-Valdez A; Terán C; Sánchez GI; Rodríguez G; Picconi MA; Ferrera A; Mendoza L; Calderón A; Murillo R; Wiesner C; Broutet N; Luciani S; Pérez C; Darragh TM; Jerónimo J; Herrero R; Almonte M;
Lancet Glob Health; 2023 Mar; 11(3):e350-e360. PubMed ID: 36796982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
Gori S; Battagello J; Gustinucci D; Campari C; Zorzi M; Frayle H; Passamonti B; Sartori G; Bulletti S; Fodero C; Cesarini E; Faggiano R; Del Mistro A
BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lower cost strategies for triage of human papillomavirus DNA-positive women.
Qiao YL; Jeronimo J; Zhao FH; Schweizer J; Chen W; Valdez M; Lu P; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Mahoney C; Berard-Bergery M; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Stoler MH; Castle PE
Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2891-901. PubMed ID: 24248915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A study of cervical cancer screening algorithms].
Zhao FH; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Chen W; Liu B; Ma JF; Hu SY; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 32(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 20819481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Low-Cost HPV Immunochromatographic Assay to Detect High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Mariano VS; Lorenzi AT; Scapulatempo-Neto C; Stein MD; Resende JC; Antoniazzi M; Villa LL; Levi JE; Longatto-Filho A; Fregnani JH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164892. PubMed ID: 27764154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of HPV Genotyping Combined with p16/Ki-67 in Detection of Cervical Precancer and Cancer Among HPV-Positive Chinese Women.
Jiang MY; Wu Z; Li T; Yu L; Zhang SK; Zhang X; Qu P; Sun P; Xi MR; Liu X; Liao G; Sun L; Zhang Y; Chen W; Qiao YL
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Feb; 13(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 31871224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping.
Trzeszcz M; Mazurec M; Jach R; Mazurec K; Kotkowska-Szeps I; Kania M; Wantuchowicz M; Wasowska J; Duczek-Polakiewicz M; Rozmus P; Streb J; Halon A
J Med Virol; 2023 Nov; 95(11):e29271. PubMed ID: 38009626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
