BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34509472)

  • 1. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
    Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Oct; 305(7):R840-53. PubMed ID: 23926132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glucose appetition in C57BL/6J mice: Influence of nonnutritive sweetener experience, food deprivation state and sex differences.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38464099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential patterns of opioid and dopamine D1 receptor antagonism on nutritive and non-nutritive sweetener intakes in C57BL/6:129 hybrid mice relative to inbred C57BL/6 and 129 mice.
    Roland M; Berglas E; Pines R; Carata I; Castillo A; Nashed M; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2023 Feb; 223():173514. PubMed ID: 36642390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.
    Zukerman S; Glendinning JI; Margolskee RF; Sclafani A
    Chem Senses; 2013 Jun; 38(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 23547138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):905-13. PubMed ID: 11555485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential effects of sucrose and fructose on dietary obesity in four mouse strains.
    Glendinning JI; Breinager L; Kyrillou E; Lacuna K; Rocha R; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Oct; 101(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 20600198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Aug; 222():112945. PubMed ID: 32417232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.