These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34510647)

  • 1. Validating dynamicity in resting state fMRI with activation-informed temporal segmentation.
    Duda M; Koutra D; Sripada C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Dec; 42(17):5718-5735. PubMed ID: 34510647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Zhang C; Baum SA; Adduru VR; Biswal BB; Michael AM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():907-918. PubMed ID: 30120987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of different dynamic functional connectivity methods to capture cognitively relevant information.
    Xie H; Zheng CY; Handwerker DA; Bandettini PA; Calhoun VD; Mitra S; Gonzalez-Castillo J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():502-514. PubMed ID: 30576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.
    Wehrheim MH; Faskowitz J; Schubert AL; Fiebach CJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jul; 45(10):e26778. PubMed ID: 38980175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks.
    Elliott ML; Knodt AR; Cooke M; Kim MJ; Melzer TR; Keenan R; Ireland D; Ramrakha S; Poulton R; Caspi A; Moffitt TE; Hariri AR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():516-532. PubMed ID: 30708106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing dynamic functional connectivity in heterogeneous samples.
    Lehmann BCL; White SR; Henson RN; Cam-Can ; Geerligs L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():635-647. PubMed ID: 28578129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI using the sliding window technique.
    Savva AD; Mitsis GD; Matsopoulos GK
    Brain Behav; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e01255. PubMed ID: 30884215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability modelling of resting-state functional connectivity.
    Teeuw J; Hulshoff Pol HE; Boomsma DI; Brouwer RM
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117842. PubMed ID: 33581291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.
    Fan L; Zhong Q; Qin J; Li N; Su J; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Apr; 42(5):1416-1433. PubMed ID: 33283954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Zhang X; Liu J; Yang Y; Zhao S; Guo L; Han J; Hu X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1463-1476. PubMed ID: 34870361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods.
    Choe AS; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Cohen JR; Xu Y; Pekar JJ; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():155-175. PubMed ID: 28687517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resting state dynamics meets anatomical structure: Temporal multiple kernel learning (tMKL) model.
    Surampudi SG; Misra J; Deco G; Bapi RS; Sharma A; Roy D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():609-620. PubMed ID: 30267857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of motion related outliers in dynamic functional connectivity using the sliding window method.
    Savva AD; Kassinopoulos M; Smyrnis N; Matsopoulos GK; Mitsis GD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jan; 330():108519. PubMed ID: 31730872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-Time Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Averaged Sliding Windows with Partial Correlations and Regression of Confounding Signals.
    Vakamudi K; Trapp C; Talaat K; Gao K; Sa De La Rocque Guimaraes B; Posse S
    Brain Connect; 2020 Oct; 10(8):448-463. PubMed ID: 32892629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?
    Hindriks R; Adhikari MH; Murayama Y; Ganzetti M; Mantini D; Logothetis NK; Deco G
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():242-256. PubMed ID: 26631813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and its relationship with dynamic functional connectivity: An application to schizophrenia.
    Fu Z; Tu Y; Di X; Du Y; Pearlson GD; Turner JA; Biswal BB; Zhang Z; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):619-631. PubMed ID: 28939432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Wavelet-Based Approach for Estimating Time-Varying Connectivity in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Savva AD; Matsopoulos GK; Mitsis GD
    Brain Connect; 2022 Apr; 12(3):285-298. PubMed ID: 34155908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel method for sparse dynamic functional connectivity analysis from resting-state fMRI.
    Wang H; Chen J; Yuan Z; Huang Y; Lin F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Nov; 411():110275. PubMed ID: 39241968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling dynamic networks: Separated and joint expressions of functional connectivity patterns in time.
    Leonardi N; Shirer WR; Greicius MD; Van De Ville D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Dec; 35(12):5984-95. PubMed ID: 25081921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of acute sleep deprivation on dynamic functional connectivity states.
    Li C; Fronczek-Poncelet J; Lange D; Hennecke E; Kroll T; Matusch A; Aeschbach D; Bauer A; Elmenhorst EM; Elmenhorst D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Mar; 41(4):994-1005. PubMed ID: 31680379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.