These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34512436)

  • 1. Three Sample Estimates of Fraction of Missing Information From Full Information Maximum Likelihood.
    Chen L; Savalei V
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():667802. PubMed ID: 34512436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage maximum likelihood approach for item-level missing data in regression.
    Chen L; Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2306-2323. PubMed ID: 32333330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pay Attention to the Ignorable Missing Data Mechanisms! An Exploration of Their Impact on the Efficiency of Regression Coefficients.
    Chen L; Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(6):1134-1159. PubMed ID: 37039444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved methods for estimating fraction of missing information in multiple imputation.
    Pan Q; Wei R
    Cogent Math Stat; 2018; 5():1551504. PubMed ID: 30899916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators.
    Cham H; Reshetnyak E; Rosenfeld B; Breitbart W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):12-30. PubMed ID: 27834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating FIML and multiple imputation in joint ordinal-continuous measurements models with missing data.
    Lim AJ; Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 34545537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Missing data in longitudinal studies: cross-sectional multiple imputation provides similar estimates to full-information maximum likelihood.
    Ferro MA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 24210708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory.
    Graham JW; Olchowski AE; Gilreath TD
    Prev Sci; 2007 Sep; 8(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 17549635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principled missing data methods for researchers.
    Dong Y; Peng CY
    Springerplus; 2013 Dec; 2(1):222. PubMed ID: 23853744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A note on the relationships between multiple imputation, maximum likelihood and fully Bayesian methods for missing responses in linear regression models.
    Chen Q; Ibrahim JG
    Stat Interface; 2014 Jul; 6(3):315-324. PubMed ID: 25309677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling Missing Data With Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Techniques.
    Schminkey DL; von Oertzen T; Bullock L
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Aug; 39(4):286-97. PubMed ID: 27176912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques.
    Chen PY; Wu W; Garnier-Villarreal M; Kite BA; Jia F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 31099262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical likelihood method for non-ignorable missing data problems.
    Guan Z; Qin J
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Jan; 23(1):113-135. PubMed ID: 27647436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the Performances of Missing Data Handling Methods in Ability Estimation From Sparse Data.
    Xiao J; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):932-954. PubMed ID: 32855565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group comparisons involving missing data in clinical trials: a comparison of estimates and power (size) for some simple approaches.
    Miller ME; Morgan TM; Espeland MA; Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2383-97. PubMed ID: 11512129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods to analyze treatment effects in the presence of missing data for a continuous heavy drinking outcome measure when participants drop out from treatment in alcohol clinical trials.
    Witkiewitz K; Falk DE; Kranzler HR; Litten RZ; Hallgren KA; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Nov; 38(11):2826-34. PubMed ID: 25421518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New computations for RMSEA and CFI following FIML and TS estimation with missing data.
    Zhang X; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):263-283. PubMed ID: 35007107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation with sequential penalized regression.
    Zahid FM; Heumann C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1311-1327. PubMed ID: 29451087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.