These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34512474)

  • 1. Opposites in Reasoning Processes: Do We Use Them More Than We Think, but Less Than We Could?
    Branchini E; Capitani E; Burro R; Savardi U; Bianchi I
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():715696. PubMed ID: 34512474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Thinking in Opposites in Order to Think Differently Improve Creativity?
    Bianchi I; Branchini E
    J Intell; 2023 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 37233334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Executive Functions and Improvement of Thinking: An Intervention Program to Enhance Deductive Reasoning Abilities.
    García-Madruga JA; Orenes I; Vila Chaves JÓ; Gómez-Veiga I
    Span J Psychol; 2022 Dec; 25():e32. PubMed ID: 36519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
    Seyyed Hashemi SF; Tehrani-Doost M; Khosrowabadi R
    Basic Clin Neurosci; 2023; 14(4):529-542. PubMed ID: 38050565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology.
    Shin HS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 31813196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring how students think: a new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols.
    Pottier P; Hardouin JB; Hodges BD; Pistorius MA; Connault J; Durant C; Clairand R; Sebille V; Barrier JH; Planchon B
    Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 44(9):926-935. PubMed ID: 20716103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Debiasing thinking among non-WEIRD reasoners.
    Boissin E; Josserand M; De Neys W; Caparos S
    Cognition; 2024 Feb; 243():105681. PubMed ID: 38043179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasoning strategies determine the effect of disconfirmation on belief in false claims.
    Gratton C; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 34050493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 27176044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?
    Markovits H
    J Intell; 2024 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38535159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning.
    Białek M; Muda R; Stewart K; Niszczota P; Pieńkosz D
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104420. PubMed ID: 33032818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic reasoning: where we've been, where we're going.
    Monteiro SM; Norman G
    Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25 Suppl 1():S26-32. PubMed ID: 24246103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation.
    Janssen EM; Velinga SB; de Neys W; van Gog T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103322. PubMed ID: 33989834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasoning strategies explain individual differences in social reasoning.
    Gagnon-St-Pierre É; Doucerain MM; Markovits H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 32897098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality.
    Byrne RM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2007 Dec; 30(5-6):439-53; discussion 453-76. PubMed ID: 18321404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasoning strategies and semantic memory effects in deductive reasoning.
    Brisson J; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):920-930. PubMed ID: 32107718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different strategies in solving series completion inductive reasoning problems: an fMRI and computational study.
    Liang P; Jia X; Taatgen NA; Zhong N; Li K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Aug; 93(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 24841995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking.
    Norman GR; Monteiro SD; Sherbino J; Ilgen JS; Schmidt HG; Mamede S
    Acad Med; 2017 Jan; 92(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 27782919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.