These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34513866)

  • 1. Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.
    Thepass G; Lemij HG; Vermeer KA; van der Steen J; Pel JJM
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():679297. PubMed ID: 34513866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening.
    Meethal NSK; Pel JJM; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; George R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 30944987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry.
    Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George R
    J Glaucoma; 2020 May; 29(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 32108671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter.
    Mazumdar D; Pel JJ; Panday M; Asokan R; Vijaya L; Shantha B; George R; Van Der Steen J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 62(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24492502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and Repeatability of Saccadic Response Times Across the Visual Field in Eye Movement Perimetry.
    Pel JJ; van Beijsterveld MC; Thepass G; van der Steen J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 2(7):3. PubMed ID: 24349881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case control study examining the feasibility of using eye tracking perimetry to differentiate patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.
    Tatham AJ; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):839. PubMed ID: 33436922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saccadic reaction time in mirror image sectors across horizontal meridian in eye movement perimetry.
    Mazumdar D; Meethal NSK; George R; Pel JJM
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2630. PubMed ID: 33514780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
    Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.