149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34514523)
1. Is There an Optimal Definition for a Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer?
Brac B; Dufour C; Behal H; Vanderbeken M; Labreuche J; Leteurtre E; Mariette C; Eveno C; Piessen G; Renaud F;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8337-8346. PubMed ID: 34514523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Depypere L; Moons J; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Peters C; Sagaert X; Coosemans W; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 29036407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment.
Ghadban T; Reeh M; Koenig AM; Nentwich MF; Bellon E; Izbicki JR; Vashist YK; Kutup A
Ann Surg; 2017 Dec; 266(6):988-994. PubMed ID: 27617855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.
Hulshoff JB; Faiz Z; Karrenbeld A; Kats-Ugurlu G; Burgerhof JG; Smit JK; Plukker JT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S1301-9. PubMed ID: 26314875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Verhage RJ; Zandvoort HJ; ten Kate FJ; van Hillegersberg R
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 21566512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of circumferential radial margin involvement in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a case series.
Boerner T; Carr R; Hsu M; Tan KS; Sigel C; Tang L; Harrington C; Ku GY; Ilson DH; Janjigian YY; Wu AJ; Sihag S; Bains MS; Bott MJ; Isbell JM; Park BJ; Jones DR; Molena D
Int J Surg; 2023 Nov; 109(11):3251-3261. PubMed ID: 37549056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lack of independent significance of a close (<1 mm) circumferential resection margin involvement in esophageal and junctional cancer.
O'Farrell NJ; Donohoe CL; Muldoon C; Costelloe JM; King S; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2727-33. PubMed ID: 23463085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients without neoadjuvant treatment.
Yang Z; Lin H; Wang Z; Rong L; Zhang X; Wang L; Qin J; Xue X; Li Y; Xue L
BMC Cancer; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1180. PubMed ID: 36384463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the Margin Matter in Esophageal Cancer.
Karstens KF; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
Dig Surg; 2018; 35(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 28697493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic significance of the positive circumferential resection margin in pathologic T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Okada N; Fujii S; Fujita T; Kanamori J; Kojima T; Hayashi R; Daiko H
Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 26391150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma.
Pultrum BB; Honing J; Smit JK; van Dullemen HM; van Dam GM; Groen H; Hollema H; Plukker JT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):812-20. PubMed ID: 19924487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients receiving potentially curative treatment for oesophageal cancer.
Quinn LM; Hollis AC; Hodson J; Elshafie MA; Hallissey MT; Whiting JL; Griffiths EA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 29843937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostication and optimal criteria of circumferential margin involvement for esophageal cancer after chemoradiation and esophagectomy.
Potdar A; Chen KC; Kuo SW; Lin MW; Liao HC; Huang PM; Lee YH; Wang HP; Han ML; Cheng CH; Hsu CH; Huang TC; Hsu FM; Lu SL; Lee JM
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1111998. PubMed ID: 37503328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus.
Rao VS; Yeung MM; Cooke J; Salim E; Jain PK
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):745-9. PubMed ID: 22161989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.
Evans R; Bundred JR; Kaur P; Hodson J; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2019 Oct; 3(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 31592511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New 3-Tiered Circumferential Resection Margin Criteria in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee GD; Lee SE; Kim KM; Kim YH; Ahn JH; Jung S; Choi YL; Kim HR; Park SI; Shim YM
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 26501489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Validation of the Optimal Circumferential Resection Margin in Pathological T3 Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Haneda R; Kikuchi H; Nagakura Y; Notsu A; Booka E; Murakami T; Matsumoto T; Mayanagi S; Morita Y; Hiramatsu Y; Tsubosa Y; Takeuchi H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 35235087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in T3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Yang YS; Wang YC; Deng HY; Yuan Y; Wang ZQ; He D; Chen LQ
Ann Transl Med; 2018 Aug; 6(15):303. PubMed ID: 30211191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer.
Chan DS; Reid TD; Howell I; Lewis WG
Br J Surg; 2013 Mar; 100(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 23319427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiation therapy and surgery.
Liu CY; Wang BY; Lee MY; Tsai YC; Liu CC; Shih CH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Oct; 76(10):570-5. PubMed ID: 23938149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
