These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34514927)

  • 21. Rank-Minimization with a two-step analysis should replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 22118264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
    Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should minimization replace randomization in all clinical trials?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22083018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limits to causal inference based on Mendelian randomization: a comparison with randomized controlled trials.
    Nitsch D; Molokhia M; Smeeth L; DeStavola BL; Whittaker JC; Leon DA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 16410347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why randomized interventional studies.
    La Caze A
    J Med Philos; 2013 Aug; 38(4):352-68. PubMed ID: 23856475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ERDO - a framework to select an appropriate randomization procedure for clinical trials.
    Hilgers RD; Uschner D; Rosenberger WF; Heussen N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29202708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
    Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
    J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some practical problems in implementing randomization.
    Downs M; Tucker K; Christ-Schmidt H; Wittes J
    Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 20484491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Avoiding bias in trials in which allocation ratio is varied.
    Altman DG
    J R Soc Med; 2018 Apr; 111(4):143-144. PubMed ID: 29648508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial.
    Marcus SM; Stuart EA; Wang P; Shadish WR; Steiner PM
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 22563844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.
    Bridgman S; Engebretsen L; Dainty K; Kirkley A; Maffulli N;
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):1000-6. PubMed ID: 14608321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomization in controlled clinical trials: why the flip of a coin is so important.
    Blume J; Peipert JF
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Aug; 11(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 15559341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Block randomization in clinical trials].
    Yang HL; Wu XB; Mao C
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 53(4):437-440. PubMed ID: 30982284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to randomize.
    Vickers AJ
    J Soc Integr Oncol; 2006; 4(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 17022927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of selection bias on the test decision. A simulation study.
    Tamm M; Cramer E; Kennes LN; Heussen N
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 22101391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials.
    Berger VW; Rezvani A; Makarewicz VA
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Apr; 24(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 12689737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness.
    Zhao W; Weng Y; Wu Q; Palesch Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21544929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials.
    Berger VW; Bour LJ; Carter K; Chipman JJ; Everett CC; Heussen N; Hewitt C; Hilgers RD; Luo YA; Renteria J; Ryeznik Y; Sverdlov O; Uschner D;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):168. PubMed ID: 34399696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.