164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34515357)
1. Study on the concordance between different SNP-genotyping platforms in sheep.
Marina H; Chitneedi P; Pelayo R; Suárez-Vega A; Esteban-Blanco C; Gutiérrez-Gil B; Arranz JJ
Anim Genet; 2021 Dec; 52(6):868-880. PubMed ID: 34515357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms.
Berry DP; O'Brien A; Wall E; McDermott K; Randles S; Flynn P; Park S; Grose J; Weld R; McHugh N
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):86. PubMed ID: 27832740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and characterization of a high-resolution multiple-SNP capture array by target sequencing for sheep.
Guo Y; Bai F; Wang J; Fu S; Zhang Y; Liu X; Zhang Z; Shao J; Li R; Wang F; Zhang L; Zheng H; Wang X; Liu Y; Jiang Y
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36402741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical note: High fidelity of whole-genome amplified sheep (Ovis aries) deoxyribonucleic acid using a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array-based genotyping platform.
Magee DA; Park SD; Scraggs E; Murphy AM; Doherty ML; Kijas JW; ; MacHugh DE
J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3183-6. PubMed ID: 20562352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of sequencing coverage and genotyping strategies to assess neutral and adaptive diversity.
Benjelloun B; Boyer F; Streeter I; Zamani W; Engelen S; Alberti A; Alberto FJ; BenBati M; Ibnelbachyr M; Chentouf M; Bechchari A; Rezaei HR; Naderi S; Stella A; Chikhi A; Clarke L; Kijas J; Flicek P; Taberlet P; Pompanon F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1497-1515. PubMed ID: 31359622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing a 670k genotyping array to tag ~2M SNPs across 24 horse breeds.
Schaefer RJ; Schubert M; Bailey E; Bannasch DL; Barrey E; Bar-Gal GK; Brem G; Brooks SA; Distl O; Fries R; Finno CJ; Gerber V; Haase B; Jagannathan V; Kalbfleisch T; Leeb T; Lindgren G; Lopes MS; Mach N; da Câmara Machado A; MacLeod JN; McCoy A; Metzger J; Penedo C; Polani S; Rieder S; Tammen I; Tetens J; Thaller G; Verini-Supplizi A; Wade CM; Wallner B; Orlando L; Mickelson JR; McCue ME
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 28750625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations.
Gorjanc G; Cleveland MA; Houston RD; Hickey JM
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):12. PubMed ID: 25887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing low-pass sequencing and genotyping for trait mapping in pharmacogenetics.
Wasik K; Berisa T; Pickrell JK; Li JH; Fraser DJ; King K; Cox C
BMC Genomics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):197. PubMed ID: 33743587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global assessment of genomic variation in cattle by genome resequencing and high-throughput genotyping.
Zhan B; Fadista J; Thomsen B; Hedegaard J; Panitz F; Bendixen C
BMC Genomics; 2011 Nov; 12():557. PubMed ID: 22082336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of genotype quality parameters for SowPro90, a new genotyping array for swine1.
Wijesena HR; Rohrer GA; Nonneman DJ; Keel BN; Petersen JL; Kachman SD; Ciobanu DC
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3262-3273. PubMed ID: 31150541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population-tailored mock genome enables genomic studies in species without a reference genome.
Sabadin F; Carvalho HF; Galli G; Fritsche-Neto R
Mol Genet Genomics; 2022 Jan; 297(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 34755217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
